From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE740C433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50D364F97 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229995AbhCQBa7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:30:59 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:40354 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229739AbhCQBa3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:30:29 -0400 IronPort-SDR: wTASfuCGl0M5Kz7Arte2V8tkd/JKlXQ4a0p56Kjb4Z4wOpQCINxSWlI+yUvF4sjqdshCYnDeg2 t66AJQ4wMb1w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9925"; a="186006318" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,254,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="186006318" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2021 18:30:29 -0700 IronPort-SDR: J6Al5X435kM6nxaU0dcjd3WZPJ/3qExClmT6YtnIwJyOssL3KaBXbEXt8viPJ0Qw8OLg562xXd Cun3VnQtmwiw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,254,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="405739565" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com ([10.54.74.11]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2021 18:30:29 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:30:28 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: "Jin, Yao" Cc: Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Align CSV output for summary mode Message-ID: <20210317013028.GT203350@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20210316072900.1739-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20210316163421.GQ203350@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20210316200220.GS203350@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Is it serious or just a joke? :) I would prefer to not be compatible (at least not until someone complains), but if compatibility is required then yes opting in to the broken format would be better. Perhaps not with that name. And the option could be hidden in the perf config file instead of being on the command line. -Andi