public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	will@kernel.org, rui.xiang@huawei.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: stacktrace: Add skip when task == current
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:36:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210317183636.GG12269@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317142050.57712-3-chenjun102@huawei.com>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:20:50PM +0000, Chen Jun wrote:
> On ARM64, cat /sys/kernel/debug/page_owner, all pages return the same
> stack:
>  stack_trace_save+0x4c/0x78
>  register_early_stack+0x34/0x70
>  init_page_owner+0x34/0x230
>  page_ext_init+0x1bc/0x1dc
> 
> The reason is that:
> check_recursive_alloc always return 1 because that
> entries[0] is always equal to ip (__set_page_owner+0x3c/0x60).
> 
> The root cause is that:
> commit 5fc57df2f6fd ("arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK")
> make the save_trace save 2 more entries.
> 
> Add skip in arch_stack_walk when task == current.
> 
> Fixes: 5fc57df2f6fd ("arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index ad20981..c26b0ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -201,11 +201,12 @@ void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
>  
>  	if (regs)
>  		start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
> -	else if (task == current)
> +	else if (task == current) {
> +		((struct stacktrace_cookie *)cookie)->skip += 2;
>  		start_backtrace(&frame,
>  				(unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
>  				(unsigned long)arch_stack_walk);
> -	else
> +	} else
>  		start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(task),
>  				thread_saved_pc(task));

I don't like abusing the cookie here. It's void * as it's meant to be an
opaque type. I'd rather skip the first two frames in walk_stackframe()
instead before invoking fn().

Prior to the conversion to ARCH_STACKWALK, we were indeed skipping two
more entries in __save_stack_trace() if tsk == current. Something like
below, completely untested:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ad20981dfda4..2a9f759aa41a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -115,10 +115,15 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_frame);
 void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
 			     bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
 {
+	/* for the current task, we don't want this function nor its caller */
+	int skip = tsk == current ? 2 : 0;
+
 	while (1) {
 		int ret;
 
-		if (!fn(data, frame->pc))
+		if (skip)
+			skip--;
+		else if (!fn(data, frame->pc))
 			break;
 		ret = unwind_frame(tsk, frame);
 		if (ret < 0)


-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-17 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17 14:20 [PATCH 0/2] Fix page_owner broken on arm64 Chen Jun
2021-03-17 14:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] stacktrace: Move struct stacktrace_cookie to stacktrace.h Chen Jun
2021-03-17 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: stacktrace: Add skip when task == current Chen Jun
2021-03-17 18:36   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-03-17 19:34     ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-18  3:24       ` chenjun (AM)
2021-03-18 13:22         ` chenjun (AM)
2021-03-18 16:17       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-18 17:12         ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-18 18:36           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-17 22:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix page_owner broken on arm64 Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210317183636.GG12269@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenjun102@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox