From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E35C433E9 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE26D64F6B for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230094AbhCSLGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:06:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39600 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229904AbhCSLFl (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:05:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AFE2C06175F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k8so8658927wrc.3 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:05:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=4/chfQtIv4nkYAhw823ZDxPsTY3OzuaLkKHNmOeT7jY=; b=Vzo9kEvKSFjCgF3u/xU/KHGfVl2K/vlYFQAD38/teB0a4LANjjXp/zZWeg7HEyfnRP 2ncamnZAptv1u18sshdQmfkpLO70SorzlfQDcqlImCIqdvuUKjpki69jFQKUkq/H9sCo pfvNvOA+ldgHbgyJEEnIillJNT2t6yXp4zGDc/Os9Nsp/hj7cgvsRs7adqZQkamIjUg3 J2kaIwVvyJnBrL15jO218e6JV5Wah0VB1XdF1n1Wr+nuBd0rIHNktYgVkQ+IByzGRhUQ AP/wxv5fiysZ7PTGzmP4gSTkJQS50hDGcjiL3sdLbkFWkroJfz4r9bcfWwgwTbITO/Va hhqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=4/chfQtIv4nkYAhw823ZDxPsTY3OzuaLkKHNmOeT7jY=; b=DBkrCy4PT7R0/FO1htlfVem9qjhjh13vbJ1qUwa1H+PD7GlMCsErp4fJkxvY9/piRm GM7NTWBbETtYhA5vZBy/l6QC4AUsG+CZbiGrDPpdkYQNugCSkCKG0CnTI534oYYQaWCs 39DJWfcnTUPY4lxc59RBr9wUSdMpdUu3B/AoXInBceidJ7HjNxUZT/L3oKgtprb6bvk4 b+SZ4lyess6rz0EF3SjSJ2BEEy11jEnWo+3BdQszDRPLSI3AkbS50fKHg/RzwQffOiGP nWSS8gUxn+a+YYpP+V6wTGrHDlbb8q4yqlNxNGSRgIslAVjJQdvrdAPuN6o9vsdlX940 23PA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QGTB3CLi3DKcmOAqI2UYEi59TBNy90Zb86qUkvO3LJghPFsMf M56msIy7Xf+bzrCHH8plaGK3Aw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjEFbBmaa3JKCf17wA3LZKsE8ujdZs700Nr3q83zpiD4R/NgKRFxXRqcSK3AVITKnZ1R0B/g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6703:: with SMTP id o3mr3886879wru.357.1616151939819; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([82.142.18.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y205sm7232314wmc.18.2021.03.19.04.05.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 04:05:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Lezcano To: heiko@sntech.de Cc: Rob Herring , Johan Jonker , Helen Koike , Shunqian Zheng , Jacob Chen , Chen-Yu Tsai , Markus Reichl , Robin Murphy , Boris Brezillon , devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS), linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support), linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH] dt: rockchip: rk3399: Add dynamic power coefficient for GPU Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:05:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20210319110511.24787-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The DTPM framework is looking for upstream SoC candidates to share the power numbers. We can see around different numbers but the one which seems to be consistent with the initial post for the values on the CPUs can be found in the patch https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/810159/ I don't know the precision of this value but it is better than nothing. Hopefully, one day SoC vendors will be more generous with the power numbers at least for the SoC which are from the previous generation and give the community the opportunity to develop power based frameworks. --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index edbbf35fe19e..1ab1d293d2e9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi @@ -1933,6 +1933,7 @@ interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu"; clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>; #cooling-cells = <2>; + dynamic-power-coefficient = <977>; power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_GPU>; status = "disabled"; }; -- 2.17.1