From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [patch 08/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:30:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323213708.305191020@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210323213019.217008708@linutronix.de
None of these functions is used when CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n.
Remove the gunk. Remove pointless comments and clean up the coding style
mess while at it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 56 +++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -23,29 +23,25 @@
* @tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree
* @pi_tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree
* @task: task reference to the blocked task
+ * @lock: Pointer to the rt_mutex on which the waiter blocks
+ * @prio: Priority of the waiter
+ * @deadline: Deadline of the waiter if applicable
*/
struct rt_mutex_waiter {
- struct rb_node tree_entry;
- struct rb_node pi_tree_entry;
+ struct rb_node tree_entry;
+ struct rb_node pi_tree_entry;
struct task_struct *task;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
- int prio;
- u64 deadline;
+ int prio;
+ u64 deadline;
};
-/*
- * Various helpers to access the waiters-tree:
- */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-
static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters.rb_root);
}
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w = NULL;
@@ -62,42 +58,12 @@ static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(st
return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters.rb_root);
}
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
-}
-
-#else
-
-static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
- return false;
-}
-
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return false;
-}
-
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return NULL;
+ return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
+ pi_tree_entry);
}
-#endif
-
-/*
- * lock->owner state tracking:
- */
#define RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS 1UL
static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 21:30 [patch 00/14] locking/rtmutex: Spring cleaning Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 01/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 02/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 03/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 04/14] locking/rtmutex: Consolidate rt_mutex_init() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 05/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 06/14] locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 07/14] locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 09/14] locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 10/14] locking/rtmutex: Move debug functions as inlines into common header Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 11/14] locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 12/14] locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 13/14] locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 14/14] locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:47 ` [patch 00/14] locking/rtmutex: Spring cleaning Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210323213708.305191020@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox