From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [patch 14/14] locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:30:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323213708.908341972@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210323213019.217008708@linutronix.de
The warning as written is expensive and not really required for a
production kernel. Make it depend on rt mutex debugging and use !in_task()
for the condition which generates far better code and gives the same
answer.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1445,9 +1445,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interrup
*
* @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
*
- * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to
- * call it from atomic regions, but not from hard interrupt or soft
- * interrupt context.
+ * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to call it
+ * from atomic regions, but not from hard or soft interrupt context.
*
* Returns 1 on success and 0 on contention
*/
@@ -1455,7 +1454,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_m
{
int ret;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || in_nmi() || in_serving_softirq()))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_DEBUG) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()))
return 0;
if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 21:30 [patch 00/14] locking/rtmutex: Spring cleaning Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 01/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 02/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 03/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 04/14] locking/rtmutex: Consolidate rt_mutex_init() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 05/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 06/14] locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 07/14] locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 08/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 09/14] locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 10/14] locking/rtmutex: Move debug functions as inlines into common header Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 11/14] locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 12/14] locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` [patch 13/14] locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-03-24 7:22 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:47 ` [patch 00/14] locking/rtmutex: Spring cleaning Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210323213708.908341972@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox