From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: return 0 for buffer getfd ioctl handler
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:33:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329133324.67eef6d8@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322084135.17536-1-aardelean@deviqon.com>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:41:35 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com> wrote:
> As Lars pointed out, we could either return the FD vs memcpy-ing it to the
> userspace data object.
>
> However, this comment exposed a bug. We should return 0 or negative from
> these ioctl() handlers. Because an ioctl() handler can also return
> IIO_IOCTL_UNHANDLED (which is positive 1), which means that the ioctl()
> handler doesn't support this ioctl number. Positive 1 could also be a valid
> FD number in some corner cases.
>
> The reason we did this is to be able to differentiate between an error
> code and an unsupported ioctl number; for unsupported ioctl numbers, the
> main loop should keep going.
>
> Maybe we should change this to a higher negative number, to avoid such
> cases when/if we add more ioctl() handlers.
That sounds like a sensible follow up plan to me - perhaps we could
use EOPNOTSUPP for this directly but add special handling for that in
the core so it doesn't worry about it as long as someone supports the ioctl.
>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> Fixes: f73f7f4da5818 ("iio: buffer: add ioctl() to support opening extra buffers for IIO device")
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index ee5aab9d4a23..d7a15c9bb0cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ static long iio_device_buffer_getfd(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned long arg
> goto error_free_ib;
> }
>
> - return fd;
> + return 0;
>
> error_free_ib:
> kfree(ib);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-29 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 8:41 [PATCH] iio: buffer: return 0 for buffer getfd ioctl handler Alexandru Ardelean
2021-03-29 12:33 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210329133324.67eef6d8@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=aardelean@deviqon.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox