[GIT PULL] OP-TEE tracepoints fix for v5.13

[GIT PULL] OP-TEE tracepoints fix for v5.13

[Jens Wiklander]

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

The previous pull request for OP-TEE tracepoints introduced a build
error when building whithout O=..., apparently many regression builds
uses that option.

Please pull this small fix for the build error.

Thanks,
Jens

The following changes since commit 0101947dbcc3204f08fb5b69a21dbd4b1535cad6:

  tee: optee: add invoke_fn tracepoints (2021-03-15 12:04:01 +0100)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git/ tags/optee-tracepoints-fix-for-v5.13

for you to fetch changes up to 7ccdcaace80810175bd20b2ece856b42edd43991:

  tee: optee: fix build error caused by recent optee tracepoints feature (2021-03-30 09:33:33 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fixes build error for recently added OP-TEE tracepoints

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jisheng Zhang (1):
      tee: optee: fix build error caused by recent optee tracepoints feature

 drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Re: [GIT PULL] OP-TEE tracepoints fix for v5.13

[Jens Wiklander]

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:23 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:22:08 +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > The previous pull request for OP-TEE tracepoints introduced a build
> > error when building whithout O=..., apparently many regression builds
> > uses that option.
> >
> > Please pull this small fix for the build error.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jens
> >
> > [...]
>
> You asked for this to be merged for 5.13, but as the change is clearly correct
> and required as a build fix, I added it as a fix for 5.12 instead, hope that's
> ok.
>
> Merged into arm/fixes, thanks!
>
> merge commit: 3e530f89d72dd1ab31e20d6f8567e357b928705c

OK. Please note that this pulls in 0101947dbcc3 ("tee: optee: add
invoke_fn tracepoints") (the commit just before actually) which I
believe was queued for v5.13.

Cheers,
Jens