From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B37C433B4 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2DB61073 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236155AbhCaOp3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:45:29 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35631 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236026AbhCaOo4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:44:56 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 7AF7C68B05; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:44:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joel Stanley , David Woodhouse , Richard Weinberger , Kees Cook , "William A . Kennington III" , Lei YU , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2: Hook up splice_write callback Message-ID: <20210331144453.GA9931@lst.de> References: <20210330134537.423447-1-joel@jms.id.au> <20210330161715.GA12783@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:31:00PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > The same goes for quite a few other filesystems, actually - at least > adfs, affs, bfs, hfs, hfsplus, hostfs, hpfs, minix, omfs, sysv, ufs > and vboxsf are in the same boat, and I suspect that ecryptfs and ntfs > might be too. > > Christoph, do you see any problems with doing the same thing for that > bunch as well? Linus asked to only fix things up where we get reports, but I think his intent there was more random procfs and debugfs files rather than file systems. So just doing the sweep should be fine.