From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:09:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210413170947.35ba9267@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409110305.6b0471d9@jacob-builder>
Hi Jean,
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:03:05 -0700, Jacob Pan
<jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > problems:
> >
> > * We don't have a use-case for binding the mm of a remote process (and
> > it's supposedly difficult for device drivers to do it securely). So
> > OK, we remove the mm argument from iommu_sva_bind_device() and use the
> > current mm. But the IOMMU driver isn't going to do
> > get_task_mm(current) every time it needs the mm being bound, it will
> > take it from iommu_sva_bind_device(). Likewise iommu_sva_alloc_pasid()
> > shouldn't need to bother with get_task_mm().
> >
> > * cgroup accounting for IOASIDs needs to be on the current task.
> > Removing the mm parameter from iommu_sva_alloc_pasid() doesn't help
> > with that. Sure it indicates that iommu_sva_alloc_pasid() needs a
> > specific task context but that's only for cgroup purpose, and I'd
> > rather pass the cgroup down from iommu_sva_bind_device() anyway (but am
> > fine with keeping it within ioasid_alloc() for now). Plus it's an
> > internal helper, easy for us to check that the callers are doing the
> > right thing.
> With the above split, we really just have one allocation function:
> ioasid_alloc(), so it can manage current cgroup accounting within. Would
> this work?
After a few attempts, I don't think the split can work better. I will
restore the mm parameter and add a warning if mm != current->mm.
Thanks,
Jacob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 17:08 [PATCH 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags Jacob Pan
2021-04-08 17:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API Jacob Pan
2021-04-09 10:11 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-04-09 18:03 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-14 0:09 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2021-04-14 6:22 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-14 11:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-15 5:33 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-15 11:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-09 12:45 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-09 18:08 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-09 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-04-09 21:57 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-09 12:24 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-13 22:13 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-13 13:02 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-14 4:11 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210413170947.35ba9267@jacob-builder \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox