From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:00:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210413200057.ankb4e26ytgal7ev@archlinux-ax161> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202103262006.nHFq086E-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:27:13PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head: db24726bfefa68c606947a86132591568a06bfb4
> commit: 6b5b368fccd7109b052e45af8ba1464c8d140a49 KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key
> date: 3 weeks ago
> config: arm64-randconfig-r005-20210326 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f490a5969bd52c8a48586f134ff8f02ccbb295b3)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
> # apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6b5b368fccd7109b052e45af8ba1464c8d140a49
> git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> git fetch --no-tags linus master
> git checkout 6b5b368fccd7109b052e45af8ba1464c8d140a49
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
> ^
> 1 error generated.
>
>
> vim +/perf_num_counters +58 arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
>
> 50
> 51 int kvm_perf_init(void)
> 52 {
> 53 /*
> 54 * Check if HW_PERF_EVENTS are supported by checking the number of
> 55 * hardware performance counters. This could ensure the presence of
> 56 * a physical PMU and CONFIG_PERF_EVENT is selected.
> 57 */
> > 58 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
> 59 static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
> 60
> 61 return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
> 62 }
> 63
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
I just ran into this again. It is not a clang specific issue, it
reproduces quite easily with arm64 defconfig minus CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
and gcc 10.3.0:
arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function
'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
58 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| dec_mm_counter
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
I am not sure what the cleanest solution would be for providing a static
inline version of perf_num_counters() would be, as only arm64 actually
uses it (sh and s390 define it but it does not appear to be used) but it
is only available through CONFIG_ARM_PMU instead of just
CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS like the other two architectures mentioned above.
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 12:27 arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters' kernel test robot
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-04-14 10:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-14 10:16 ` Alexandru Elisei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26 3:54 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210413200057.ankb4e26ytgal7ev@archlinux-ax161 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox