From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] x86: Implement function_nocfi
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 23:18:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416211855.GD22348@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416203844.3803177-6-samitolvanen@google.com>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:38:34PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function addresses in
> instrumented C code with jump table addresses. This change implements
> the function_nocfi() macro, which returns the actual function address
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/page.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> index 7555b48803a8..5499a05c44fc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,20 @@ static inline void copy_user_page(void *to, void *from, unsigned long vaddr,
> extern bool __virt_addr_valid(unsigned long kaddr);
> #define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) __virt_addr_valid((unsigned long) (kaddr))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
Almost every patch is talking about this magical config symbol but it
is nowhere to be found. How do I disable it, is there a Kconfig entry
somewhere, etc, etc?
> +/*
> + * With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address
> + * references with the address of the function's CFI jump table
> + * entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the
> + * actual function instead.
> + */
> +#define function_nocfi(x) ({ \
> + void *addr; \
> + asm("leaq " __stringify(x) "(%%rip), %0\n\t" : "=r" (addr)); \
> + addr; \
> +})
Also, eww.
It seems all these newfangled things we get, mean obfuscating code even
more. What's wrong with using __nocfi instead? That's nicely out of the
way so slap that in front of functions.
Also, did you even build this on, say, 32-bit allmodconfig?
Oh well.
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
from ./include/linux/init_task.h:9,
from init/init_task.c:2:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
# define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
^
./include/linux/ftrace.h:671:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘MCOUNT_ADDR’
return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
from ./include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from ./include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from ./include/linux/syscalls.h:85,
from init/main.c:21:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
# define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
^
./include/linux/ftrace.h:671:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘MCOUNT_ADDR’
return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
from ./include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from ./include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from ./include/linux/syscalls.h:85,
from init/initramfs.c:10:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
# define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
^
./include/linux/ftrace.h:671:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘MCOUNT_ADDR’
return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
from arch/x86/events/core.c:15:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
# define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 20:38 [PATCH 00/15] x86: Add support for Clang CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 01/15] objtool: Find a destination for jumps beyond the section end Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 18:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-04-20 20:25 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 22:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-04-20 22:58 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 02/15] objtool: Add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG support Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 19:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-04-20 20:45 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 03/15] objtool: Add ASM_STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 04/15] static_call: Use global functions for the self-test Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 21:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 0:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 05/15] x86: Implement function_nocfi Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 21:18 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-04-16 21:49 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 22:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-16 22:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-16 22:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-16 22:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-16 22:37 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 23:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 10:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-19 15:13 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 22:28 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 22:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-16 22:58 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 23:40 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-17 23:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-17 23:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-18 0:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-18 16:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-18 22:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-19 15:20 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-19 15:26 ` David Laight
2021-04-19 17:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-17 14:20 ` David Laight
2021-04-17 15:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-19 8:40 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-19 16:45 ` Joao Moreira
2021-04-19 21:52 ` David Laight
2021-04-16 22:16 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 22:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86: Avoid CFI jump tables in IDT and entry points Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 22:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 23:56 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-17 0:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/ftrace: Use function_nocfi in MCOUNT_ADDR Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/extable: Do not mark exception callback as CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/alternatives: Use C int3 selftest but disable KASAN Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-17 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-19 15:26 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 7:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/purgatory: Disable CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86, relocs: Ignore __typeid__ relocations Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86, module: " Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86, cpu: Use LTO for cpu.c with CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86, kprobes: Fix optprobe_template_func type mismatch Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86, build: Allow CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to be selected Sami Tolvanen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210416211855.GD22348@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox