public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] x86: Implement function_nocfi
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 23:18:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416211855.GD22348@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416203844.3803177-6-samitolvanen@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:38:34PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function addresses in
> instrumented C code with jump table addresses. This change implements
> the function_nocfi() macro, which returns the actual function address
> instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> index 7555b48803a8..5499a05c44fc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,20 @@ static inline void copy_user_page(void *to, void *from, unsigned long vaddr,
>  extern bool __virt_addr_valid(unsigned long kaddr);
>  #define virt_addr_valid(kaddr)	__virt_addr_valid((unsigned long) (kaddr))
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG

Almost every patch is talking about this magical config symbol but it
is nowhere to be found. How do I disable it, is there a Kconfig entry
somewhere, etc, etc?

> +/*
> + * With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address
> + * references with the address of the function's CFI jump table
> + * entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the
> + * actual function instead.
> + */
> +#define function_nocfi(x) ({						\
> +	void *addr;							\
> +	asm("leaq " __stringify(x) "(%%rip), %0\n\t" : "=r" (addr));	\
> +	addr;								\
> +})

Also, eww.

It seems all these newfangled things we get, mean obfuscating code even
more. What's wrong with using __nocfi instead? That's nicely out of the
way so slap that in front of functions.

Also, did you even build this on, say, 32-bit allmodconfig?

Oh well.

In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
                 from ./include/linux/init_task.h:9,
                 from init/init_task.c:2:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 # define MCOUNT_ADDR  ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
                                        ^
./include/linux/ftrace.h:671:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘MCOUNT_ADDR’
  return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
                 from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
                 from ./include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
                 from ./include/trace/syscall.h:7,
                 from ./include/linux/syscalls.h:85,
                 from init/main.c:21:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 # define MCOUNT_ADDR  ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
                                        ^
./include/linux/ftrace.h:671:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘MCOUNT_ADDR’
  return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
                 from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
                 from ./include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
                 from ./include/trace/syscall.h:7,
                 from ./include/linux/syscalls.h:85,
                 from init/initramfs.c:10:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 # define MCOUNT_ADDR  ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
                                        ^
./include/linux/ftrace.h:671:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘MCOUNT_ADDR’
  return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/ftrace.h:22:0,
                 from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
                 from arch/x86/events/core.c:15:
./include/linux/ftrace.h: In function ‘ftrace_init_nop’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:9:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘function_nocfi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 # define MCOUNT_ADDR  ((unsigned long)(function_nocfi(__fentry__)))
...


-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 20:38 [PATCH 00/15] x86: Add support for Clang CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 01/15] objtool: Find a destination for jumps beyond the section end Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 18:14   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-04-20 20:25     ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 22:55       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-04-20 22:58         ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 02/15] objtool: Add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG support Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20 19:47   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-04-20 20:45     ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 03/15] objtool: Add ASM_STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 04/15] static_call: Use global functions for the self-test Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 21:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17  0:16     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 05/15] x86: Implement function_nocfi Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 21:18   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-04-16 21:49     ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 22:02       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-16 22:06         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-16 22:14           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-16 22:20             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-16 22:37               ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 23:02                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 10:16                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-19 15:13                     ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 22:28           ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 22:52             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-16 22:58               ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 23:40               ` Kees Cook
2021-04-17 23:19                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-17 23:53                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-18  0:11                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-18 16:17                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-18 22:57                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-19 15:20                           ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-19 15:26                       ` David Laight
2021-04-19 17:46                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-17 14:20             ` David Laight
2021-04-17 15:48               ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-04-19  8:40             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-19 16:45               ` Joao Moreira
2021-04-19 21:52               ` David Laight
2021-04-16 22:16         ` Kees Cook
2021-04-16 22:13       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86: Avoid CFI jump tables in IDT and entry points Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 22:26   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 23:56     ` Kees Cook
2021-04-17  0:02       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/ftrace: Use function_nocfi in MCOUNT_ADDR Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/extable: Do not mark exception callback as CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/alternatives: Use C int3 selftest but disable KASAN Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-17 11:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-19 15:26     ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-20  7:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/purgatory: Disable CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86, relocs: Ignore __typeid__ relocations Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86, module: " Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86, cpu: Use LTO for cpu.c with CFI Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86, kprobes: Fix optprobe_template_func type mismatch Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86, build: Allow CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to be selected Sami Tolvanen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210416211855.GD22348@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox