From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: fix an error code in nand_setup_interface()
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210417143124.6a79c71c@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210417102426.GP6048@kadam>
Hi Dan,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote on Sat, 17 Apr 2021
13:24:26 +0300:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote on Wed, 14 Apr 2021
> > 08:56:33 +0300:
> >
> > > We should return an error code if the timing mode is not acknowledged
> > > by the NAND chip.
> >
> > This truly is questionable (and I am not yet decided whether the answer
> > should be yes or no).
> >
> > Returning an error here would produce the entire boot sequence to fail,
> > even though the NAND chip would work in mode 0.
> >
> > Not returning an error would print the below warning (so the
> > user/developer is warned) and continue the boot with the slowest
> > timing interface.
> >
> > Honestly I would be more in favor of letting things as they are
> > because I don't think this may be considered as a buggy situation, but I
> > am open to discussion.
> >
>
> If we decided that the original code is correct then one way to silence
> the warning would be to do:
>
> if (tmode_param[0] != chip->best_interface_config->timings.mode) {
> pr_warn("timing mode %d not acknowledged by the NAND chip\n",
> chip->best_interface_config->timings.mode);
> ret = 0;
> goto err_reset_chip;
> }
>
> Setting "ret = 0;" right before the goto makes the code look more
> intentional to human readers as well.
Absolutely right. Let's got for it then.
Cheers,
Miquèl
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-17 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 5:56 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: fix an error code in nand_setup_interface() Dan Carpenter
2021-04-16 15:00 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-04-17 10:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-17 12:31 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210417143124.6a79c71c@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox