Re: [PATCH 088/190] Revert "mmc_spi: add a status check for spi_sync_locked"

Laurent Pinchart
2021-04-28T08:42:12Z

Hi Greg,

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:18:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:59:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 611025983b7976df0183390a63a2166411d177f1.
> > >
> > > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> > >
> > > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > > codebase.
> > >
> > > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> > I don't spot an obvious issue with the original patch though.
>
> Ulf did :)

I've replied separately, I still think it's not an issue :-)

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart