Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (max31790) Rework to use regmap

Guenter Roeck
2021-04-26T14:17:52Z

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version
> fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting
> .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped
> those.
>
> By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of
> weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz",
> so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm
> doing something wrong.
>

Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch
of the series), or it is something like:
To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <;

Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series
which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result
in the entire series getting lost.

Guenter