Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (max31790) Rework to use regmap

Guenter Roeck
2021-04-26T14:36:08Z

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote:
> po 26. 4. 2021 v 16:18 odesílatel Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> napsal:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version
> > > fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting
> > > .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped
> > > those.
> > >
> > > By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of
> > > weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz",
> > > so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm
> > > doing something wrong.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch
> > of the series), or it is something like:
> > To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <;
> >
> > Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series
> > which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result
> > in the entire series getting lost.
> >
>
> Sorry, I will fix my email-sending procedure. Should I resend the
> patch series without the In-Reply-To field?
>
No, just keep it in mind for next time.

Thanks,
Guenter