Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets

Marco Elver
2021-07-12T10:38:55Z

On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 at 10:51, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 20:29, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:50:41PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 19:42, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi Marco,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > > To help catch ABI breaks at compile-time, add compile-time assertions to
> > > > > verify the siginfo_t layout.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > Do you want me to queue this patch in the arm64 tree, or is the series all
> > > > going together via another route?
> > >
> > > I think Eric will queue them together with a bunch of other cleanups,
> > > because as-is these patches are out-of-date as of:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a0e31f3a38e77612ed8967aaad28db6d3ee674b5
> >
> > Ok, thanks. I will ignore this then :)
>
> Eric, are these static_assert patches being sent this merge-window
> along with the other cleanups?

I'm happy to send out a rebased version of this series only. I'll go
ahead and do that later in the week if I don't hear objections.

Thanks,
-- Marco