Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Make use of DDW for indirect mapping

Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-05-11T07:57:33Z

On 01/05/2021 02:31, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> So far it's assumed possible to map the guest RAM 1:1 to the bus, which
> works with a small number of devices. SRIOV changes it as the user can
> configure hundreds VFs and since phyp preallocates TCEs and does not
> allow IOMMU pages bigger than 64K, it has to limit the number of TCEs
> per a PE to limit waste of physical pages.
>
> As of today, if the assumed direct mapping is not possible, DDW creation
> is skipped and the default DMA window "ibm,dma-window" is used instead.
>
> By using DDW, indirect mapping can get more TCEs than available for the
> default DMA window, and also get access to using much larger pagesizes
> (16MB as implemented in qemu vs 4k from default DMA window), causing a
> significant increase on the maximum amount of memory that can be IOMMU
> mapped at the same time.
>
> Indirect mapping will only be used if direct mapping is not a
> possibility.
>
> For indirect mapping, it's necessary to re-create the iommu_table with
> the new DMA window parameters, so iommu_alloc() can use it.
>
> Removing the default DMA window for using DDW with indirect mapping
> is only allowed if there is no current IOMMU memory allocated in
> the iommu_table. enable_ddw() is aborted otherwise.
>
> Even though there won't be both direct and indirect mappings at the
> same time, we can't reuse the DIRECT64_PROPNAME property name, or else
> an older kexec()ed kernel can assume direct mapping, and skip
> iommu_alloc(), causing undesirable behavior.
> So a new property name DMA64_PROPNAME "linux,dma64-ddr-window-info"
> was created to represent a DDW that does not allow direct mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> index de54ddd9decd..572879af0211 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ enum {
> DDW_EXT_QUERY_OUT_SIZE = 2
> };
>
> +static phys_addr_t ddw_memory_hotplug_max(void);
> #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
> static int tce_exchange_pseries(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index, unsigned long *tce,
> enum dma_data_direction *direction, bool realmode);
> @@ -380,6 +381,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(direct_window_list_lock);
> /* protects initializing window twice for same device */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(direct_window_init_mutex);
> #define DIRECT64_PROPNAME "linux,direct64-ddr-window-info"
> +#define DMA64_PROPNAME "linux,dma64-ddr-window-info"
>
> static int tce_clearrange_multi_pSeriesLP(unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long num_pfn, const void *arg)
> @@ -918,6 +920,7 @@ static int find_existing_ddw_windows(void)
> return 0;
>
> find_existing_ddw_windows_named(DIRECT64_PROPNAME);
> + find_existing_ddw_windows_named(DMA64_PROPNAME);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1207,10 +1210,13 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> struct device_node *dn;
> u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE];
> struct direct_window *window;
> + const char *win_name;
> struct property *win64 = NULL;
> struct failed_ddw_pdn *fpdn;
> - bool default_win_removed = false;
> + bool default_win_removed = false, direct_mapping = false;
> bool pmem_present;
> + struct pci_dn *pci = PCI_DN(pdn);
> + struct iommu_table *tbl = pci->table_group->tables[0];
>
> dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, "ibm,pmemory");
> pmem_present = dn != NULL;
> @@ -1218,8 +1224,12 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
>
> mutex_lock(&direct_window_init_mutex);
>
> - if (find_existing_ddw(pdn, &dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset, &len))
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (find_existing_ddw(pdn, &dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset, &len)) {
> + direct_mapping = (len >= max_ram_len);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&direct_window_init_mutex);
> + return direct_mapping;

Does not this break the existing case when direct_mapping==true by
skipping setting dev->dev.bus_dma_limit before returning?

> + }
>
> /*
> * If we already went through this for a previous function of
> @@ -1298,7 +1308,6 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> goto out_failed;
> }
> /* verify the window * number of ptes will map the partition */
> - /* check largest block * page size > max memory hotplug addr */
> /*
> * The "ibm,pmemory" can appear anywhere in the address space.
> * Assuming it is still backed by page structs, try MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
> @@ -1320,6 +1329,17 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> 1ULL << len,
> query.largest_available_block,
> 1ULL << page_shift);
> +
> + len = order_base_2(query.largest_available_block << page_shift);
> + win_name = DMA64_PROPNAME;

[1] ....

> + } else {
> + direct_mapping = true;
> + win_name = DIRECT64_PROPNAME;
> + }
> +
> + /* DDW + IOMMU on single window may fail if there is any allocation */
> + if (default_win_removed && !direct_mapping && iommu_table_in_use(tbl)) {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "current IOMMU table in use, can't be replaced.\n");

... remove !direct_mapping and move to [1]?

> goto out_failed;
> }
>
> @@ -1331,8 +1351,7 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> create.liobn, dn);
>
> win_addr = ((u64)create.addr_hi << 32) | create.addr_lo;
> - win64 = ddw_property_create(DIRECT64_PROPNAME, create.liobn, win_addr,
> - page_shift, len);
> + win64 = ddw_property_create(win_name, create.liobn, win_addr, page_shift, len);
> if (!win64) {
> dev_info(&dev->dev,
> "couldn't allocate property, property name, or value\n");
> @@ -1350,12 +1369,47 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> if (!window)
> goto out_del_prop;
>
> - ret = walk_system_ram_range(0, memblock_end_of_DRAM() >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> - win64->value, tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_info(&dev->dev, "failed to map direct window for %pOF: %d\n",
> - dn, ret);
> - goto out_del_list;
> + if (direct_mapping) {
> + /* DDW maps the whole partition, so enable direct DMA mapping */
> + ret = walk_system_ram_range(0, memblock_end_of_DRAM() >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + win64->value, tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "failed to map direct window for %pOF: %d\n",
> + dn, ret);
> + goto out_del_list;
> + }
> + } else {
> + struct iommu_table *newtbl;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* New table for using DDW instead of the default DMA window */
> + newtbl = iommu_pseries_alloc_table(pci->phb->node);
> + if (!newtbl) {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "couldn't create new IOMMU table\n");
> + goto out_del_list;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pci->phb->mem_resources); i++) {
> + const unsigned long mask = IORESOURCE_MEM_64 | IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +
> + /* Look for MMIO32 */
> + if ((pci->phb->mem_resources[i].flags & mask) == IORESOURCE_MEM)
> + break;

What if there is no IORESOURCE_MEM? pci->phb->mem_resources[i].start
below will have garbage.

> + }
> +
> + _iommu_table_setparms(newtbl, pci->phb->bus->number, create.liobn, win_addr,
> + 1UL << len, page_shift, 0, &iommu_table_lpar_multi_ops);
> + iommu_init_table(newtbl, pci->phb->node, pci->phb->mem_resources[i].start,
> + pci->phb->mem_resources[i].end);
> +
> + if (default_win_removed)
> + iommu_tce_table_put(tbl);

iommu_tce_table_put() should have been called when the window was removed.

Also after some thinking - what happens if there were 2 devices in the
PE and one requested 64bit DMA? This will only update
set_iommu_table_base() for the 64bit one but not for the other.

I think the right thing to do is:

1. check if table[0] is in use, if yes => fail (which this does already)

2. remove default dma window but keep the iommu_table struct with one
change - set it_size to 0 (and free it_map) so the 32bit device won't
look at a stale structure and think there is some window (imaginery
situation for phyp but easy to recreate in qemu).

3. use table[1] for newly created indirect DDW window.

4. change get_iommu_table_base() to return a usable table (or may be not
needed?).

If this sounds reasonable (does it?), the question is now if you have
time to do that and the hardware to test that, or I'll have to finish
the work :)

> + else
> + pci->table_group->tables[1] = tbl;

What is this for?

> +
> + pci->table_group->tables[0] = newtbl;
> +
> + set_iommu_table_base(&dev->dev, newtbl);
> }
>
> spin_lock(&direct_window_list_lock);
> @@ -1398,10 +1452,10 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> * as RAM, then we failed to create a window to cover persistent
> * memory and need to set the DMA limit.
> */
> - if (pmem_present && win64 && (len == max_ram_len))
> + if (pmem_present && direct_mapping && len == max_ram_len)
> dev->dev.bus_dma_limit = dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset + (1ULL << len);
>
> - return win64;
> + return win64 && direct_mapping;
> }
>
> static void pci_dma_dev_setup_pSeriesLP(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -1542,7 +1596,10 @@ static int iommu_reconfig_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long acti
> * we have to remove the property when releasing
> * the device node.
> */
> - remove_ddw(np, false, DIRECT64_PROPNAME);
> +
> + if (remove_ddw(np, false, DIRECT64_PROPNAME))
> + remove_ddw(np, false, DMA64_PROPNAME);
> +
> if (pci && pci->table_group)
> iommu_pseries_free_group(pci->table_group,
> np->full_name);
>

--
Alexey