public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>,
	Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Restructure trace_clock_global() to never block
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:26:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210501002701.981930105@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210501002625.540979896@goodmis.org

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

It was reported that a fix to the ring buffer recursion detection would
cause a hung machine when performing suspend / resume testing. The
following backtrace was extracted from debugging that case:

Call Trace:
 trace_clock_global+0x91/0xa0
 __rb_reserve_next+0x237/0x460
 ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x12a/0x3f0
 trace_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x50
 __trace_graph_return+0x1f/0x80
 trace_graph_return+0xb7/0xf0
 ? trace_clock_global+0x91/0xa0
 ftrace_return_to_handler+0x8b/0xf0
 ? pv_hash+0xa0/0xa0
 return_to_handler+0x15/0x30
 ? ftrace_graph_caller+0xa0/0xa0
 ? trace_clock_global+0x91/0xa0
 ? __rb_reserve_next+0x237/0x460
 ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x12a/0x3f0
 ? trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve+0x3c/0x120
 ? trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x6b/0xc0
 ? trace_event_raw_event_device_pm_callback_start+0x125/0x2d0
 ? dpm_run_callback+0x3b/0xc0
 ? pm_ops_is_empty+0x50/0x50
 ? platform_get_irq_byname_optional+0x90/0x90
 ? trace_device_pm_callback_start+0x82/0xd0
 ? dpm_run_callback+0x49/0xc0

With the following RIP:

RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x200

Since the fix to the recursion detection would allow a single recursion to
happen while tracing, this lead to the trace_clock_global() taking a spin
lock and then trying to take it again:

ring_buffer_lock_reserve() {
  trace_clock_global() {
    arch_spin_lock() {
      queued_spin_lock_slowpath() {
        /* lock taken */
        (something else gets traced by function graph tracer)
          ring_buffer_lock_reserve() {
            trace_clock_global() {
              arch_spin_lock() {
                queued_spin_lock_slowpath() {
                /* DEAD LOCK! */

Tracing should *never* block, as it can lead to strange lockups like the
above.

Restructure the trace_clock_global() code to instead of simply taking a
lock to update the recorded "prev_time" simply use it, as two events
happening on two different CPUs that calls this at the same time, really
doesn't matter which one goes first. Use a trylock to grab the lock for
updating the prev_time, and if it fails, simply try again the next time.
If it failed to be taken, that means something else is already updating
it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210430121758.650b6e8a@gandalf.local.home

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
Tested-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: b02414c8f045 ("ring-buffer: Fix recursion protection transitions between interrupt context") # started showing the problem
Fixes: 14131f2f98ac3 ("tracing: implement trace_clock_*() APIs") # where the bug happened
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212761
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_clock.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
index aaf6793ededa..c1637f90c8a3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
@@ -95,33 +95,49 @@ u64 notrace trace_clock_global(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int this_cpu;
-	u64 now;
+	u64 now, prev_time;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 
 	this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	now = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu);
+
 	/*
-	 * If in an NMI context then dont risk lockups and return the
-	 * cpu_clock() time:
+	 * The global clock "guarantees" that the events are ordered
+	 * between CPUs. But if two events on two different CPUS call
+	 * trace_clock_global at roughly the same time, it really does
+	 * not matter which one gets the earlier time. Just make sure
+	 * that the same CPU will always show a monotonic clock.
+	 *
+	 * Use a read memory barrier to get the latest written
+	 * time that was recorded.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
-		goto out;
+	smp_rmb();
+	prev_time = READ_ONCE(trace_clock_struct.prev_time);
+	now = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu);
 
-	arch_spin_lock(&trace_clock_struct.lock);
+	/* Make sure that now is always greater than prev_time */
+	if ((s64)(now - prev_time) < 0)
+		now = prev_time + 1;
 
 	/*
-	 * TODO: if this happens often then maybe we should reset
-	 * my_scd->clock to prev_time+1, to make sure
-	 * we start ticking with the local clock from now on?
+	 * If in an NMI context then dont risk lockups and simply return
+	 * the current time.
 	 */
-	if ((s64)(now - trace_clock_struct.prev_time) < 0)
-		now = trace_clock_struct.prev_time + 1;
+	if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
+		goto out;
 
-	trace_clock_struct.prev_time = now;
+	/* Tracing can cause strange recursion, always use a try lock */
+	if (arch_spin_trylock(&trace_clock_struct.lock)) {
+		/* Reread prev_time in case it was already updated */
+		prev_time = READ_ONCE(trace_clock_struct.prev_time);
+		if ((s64)(now - prev_time) < 0)
+			now = prev_time + 1;
 
-	arch_spin_unlock(&trace_clock_struct.lock);
+		trace_clock_struct.prev_time = now;
 
+		/* The unlock acts as the wmb for the above rmb */
+		arch_spin_unlock(&trace_clock_struct.lock);
+	}
  out:
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
-- 
2.30.1



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-01  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-01  0:26 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: A couple of last minute fixes before pushing to 5.13 Steven Rostedt
2021-05-01  0:26 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Map all PIDs to command lines Steven Rostedt
2021-05-01  0:26 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210501002701.981930105@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hi-angel@yandex.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox