From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A377DC433B4 for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 18:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C14D6008E for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 18:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231166AbhEPSXN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 May 2021 14:23:13 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:44222 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230213AbhEPSXM (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 May 2021 14:23:12 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 9CB7C1C0B76; Sun, 16 May 2021 20:21:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:21:50 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, mauro.chehab@huawei.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] staging: nuc-led: update the TODOs Message-ID: <20210516182149.GA3666@localhost> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > - Need to validate the uAPI and document it before moving > this driver out of staging. > - Stabilize and document its sysfs interface. Would you mind starting with this one? We should have existing APIs for most of functionality described... We really don't want to merge code with bad API, not even to staging. Best regards, Pavel