From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A321C2B9F8 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E84B61378 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234125AbhEYRir (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:38:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33712 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232675AbhEYRif (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:38:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5530C061756 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id t21so16735389plo.2 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:37:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=FqZUbjadb1B4THcGJT5sMXZ3kEFu1j12y+rBCLr87MY=; b=T27uSRQxNqy9fkkvryO31BKVXnZBIeoDoL6szDZylEtfWg6MbZYdZxgeQUiU3FFx7G v4PTXry4wDjPXAQH6mXluKz9vO/m6Vdqn7HWF1Quznl4lvCQpi/GXgj3ml/xec0/xdFn 74AoX2s+Ry4EG+rYyODpoPWeB97Iq7VURotSVUJGYZ9DlowL6e3kL7Z80LCQKdNeeQaD clM347VjOrzbATocIcWn7oSnlrwiXZxUD0mQHigG83IxsnyekS8DqeaNK9l48XUh0EF+ 9I0/QGqKpt2o/IdsRNT46/RvVifTtRaY7T/MqkBEMSFMx3SZHLBCU3l5PQYaCSBM2hCn uH+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=FqZUbjadb1B4THcGJT5sMXZ3kEFu1j12y+rBCLr87MY=; b=exHdidwe8sG31KTEg2OjPhYG1kVJOgqbyZusioBsCMtHe+UFSagAx6sqjffeIP+k1A 29u0jPhILnmbCtScTPLIgt1JzO3xRtt5a1uZz8DypCpx+9zrxPxuEx4zw/3NGO3HG4bg vPc71ln3di6HxTw6PGoe2Quv+xpD3W41tnvIN+XFLNq6sL3g/UnTAF6rLd+YW5hO2l6h nW9rs3X0H8clx4X3XcOLJOUF00c3wyAv05bPLiFfsQT4syY3oMqoactPt7q88sV2zt8w YqvYkOsS0Mt3gnhpZmNWG/ffTJ0ztGdIVDcbbLZIS5pbkgodEYLZ5/KYWu8Rgq32t4jX jgpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xXtaI3ZRVdN41IU2KmWWtG8Q9Dv1aDAAOHvg8nd58HzTqlvcb zryoLfaU7cVxT35hY3O4tGFKQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr3lPiVmDNhM/fjqq6u22sPHnIKPDXjlVFYzCAwPeQy3jR4MIHjJKDsw3YszpMmR4ZQPExXg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc4:b029:ef:8e98:3cb0 with SMTP id a4-20020a170902ecc4b02900ef8e983cb0mr31645764plh.50.1621964223320; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z125sm14029934pfz.218.2021.05.25.10.37.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 May 2021 10:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:37:00 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Suman Anna Cc: Bjorn Andersson , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add kernel-doc comment for is_iomem Message-ID: <20210525173700.GC1113058@xps15> References: <20210519180304.23563-1-s-anna@ti.com> <20210519180304.23563-2-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210519180304.23563-2-s-anna@ti.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:03:03PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: > Add a kernel-doc comment for the is_iomem function argument in > rproc_da_to_va(). This fixes a warning generated when building > the remoteproc_core with W=1, > warning: Function parameter or member 'is_iomem' not described in 'rproc_da_to_va' > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 626a6b90fba2..8c279039b6a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa); > * @rproc: handle of a remote processor > * @da: remoteproc device address to translate > * @len: length of the memory region @da is pointing to > + * @is_iomem: optional pointer filled in to indicate if @da is iomapped memory > * > * Some remote processors will ask us to allocate them physically contiguous > * memory regions (which we call "carveouts"), and map them to specific > -- > 2.30.1 >