From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Honggang LI <honli@redhat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/2] Enable relaxed ordering for ULPs
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:30:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210526193021.GA3644646@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1621505111.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:13:34PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Changelog:
> v1:
> * Enabled by default RO in IB/core instead of changing all users
> v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210405052404.213889-1-leon@kernel.org
>
> >From Avihai,
>
> Relaxed Ordering is a PCIe mechanism that relaxes the strict ordering
> imposed on PCI transactions, and thus, can improve performance for
> applications that can handle this lack of strict ordering.
>
> Currently, relaxed ordering can be set only by user space applications
> for user MRs. Not all user space applications support relaxed ordering
> and for this reason it was added as an optional capability that is
> disabled by default. This behavior is not changed as part of this series,
> and relaxed ordering remains disabled by default for user space.
>
> On the other hand, kernel users should universally support relaxed
> ordering, as they are designed to read data only after observing the CQE
> and use the DMA API correctly. There are a few platforms with broken
> relaxed ordering implementation, but for them relaxed ordering is expected
> to be turned off globally in the PCI level. In addition, note that this is
> not the first use of relaxed ordering. Relaxed ordering has been enabled
> by default in mlx5 ethernet driver, and user space apps use it as well for
> quite a while.
>
> Hence, this series enabled relaxed ordering by default for kernel users so
> they can benefit as well from the performance improvements.
>
> The following test results show the performance improvement achieved
> with relaxed ordering. The test was performed by running FIO traffic
> between a NVIDIA DGX A100 (ConnectX-6 NICs and AMD CPUs) and a NVMe
> storage fabric, using NFSoRDMA:
>
> Without Relaxed Ordering:
> READ: bw=16.5GiB/s (17.7GB/s), 16.5GiB/s-16.5GiB/s (17.7GB/s-17.7GB/s),
> io=1987GiB (2133GB), run=120422-120422msec
>
> With relaxed ordering:
> READ: bw=72.9GiB/s (78.2GB/s), 72.9GiB/s-72.9GiB/s (78.2GB/s-78.2GB/s),
> io=2367GiB (2542GB), run=32492-32492msec
>
> The series has been tested over NVMe, iSER, SRP and NFS with ConnectX-6
> NIC. The tests included FIO verify and stress tests, and various
> resiliency tests (shutting down NIC port in the middle of traffic,
> rebooting the target in the middle of traffic etc.).
There was such a big discussion on the last version I wondered why
this was so quiet. I guess because the cc list isn't very big..
Adding the people from the original thread, here is the patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/cover.1621505111.git.leonro@nvidia.com/
I think this is the general approach that was asked for, to special case
uverbs and turn it on in kernel universally
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 10:13 [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/2] Enable relaxed ordering for ULPs Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-20 10:13 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 1/2] RDMA: Enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-27 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-28 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-20 10:13 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/2] RDMA/mlx5: Allow modifying Relaxed Ordering via fast registration Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-26 19:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-02 12:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-26 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-05-27 8:11 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/2] Enable relaxed ordering for ULPs David Laight
2021-05-31 18:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-31 21:45 ` David Laight
2021-05-31 22:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210526193021.GA3644646@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=honli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox