From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spinand: add SPI-NAND MTD resume handler
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 10:53:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210527105346.315cf125@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527084959.1548-1-patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Hi Patrice,
<patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> wrote on Thu, 27 May 2021 10:49:59 +0200:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
>
> After power up, all SPI NAND's blocks are locked. Only read operations
> are allowed, write and erase operations are forbidden.
> The SPI NAND framework unlocks all the blocks during its initialization.
>
> During a standby low power, the memory is powered down, losing its
> configuration.
> During the resume, the QSPI driver state is restored but the SPI NAND
> framework does not reconfigured the memory.
>
> This patch adds SPI-NAND MTD PM handlers for resume ops.
> SPI NAND resume op re-initializes SPI NAND flash to its probed state.
>
> It also adds a new helper spinand_block_unlock() which is
> called in spinand_init() and in spinand_mtd_resume().
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add helper spinand_block_unlock().
> - Add spinand_ecc_enable() call.
> - Remove some dev_err().
> - Fix commit's title and message.
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> index 17f63f95f4a2..f77aeff11f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> @@ -1074,6 +1074,55 @@ static int spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int spinand_block_unlock(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev;
> + struct nand_device *nand = spinand_to_nand(spinand);
> + int ret = 0, i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nand->memorg.ntargets; i++) {
> + ret = spinand_select_target(spinand, i);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = spinand_lock_block(spinand, BL_ALL_UNLOCKED);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Please insert this helper (and use it in the probe) in a separate
patch, so that patch 2/2 only implements the _resume hook.
> +
> +static void spinand_mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct spinand_device *spinand = mtd_to_spinand(mtd);
> + struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
> + struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = spinand_reset_op(spinand);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = spinand_init_quad_enable(spinand);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = spinand_upd_cfg(spinand, CFG_OTP_ENABLE, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = spinand_manufacturer_init(spinand);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = spinand_block_unlock(spinand);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + spinand_ecc_enable(spinand, false);
> +}
> +
> static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> {
> struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev;
> @@ -1137,15 +1186,9 @@ static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> }
>
> /* After power up, all blocks are locked, so unlock them here. */
> - for (i = 0; i < nand->memorg.ntargets; i++) {
> - ret = spinand_select_target(spinand, i);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_manuf_cleanup;
> -
> - ret = spinand_lock_block(spinand, BL_ALL_UNLOCKED);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_manuf_cleanup;
> - }
> + ret = spinand_block_unlock(spinand);
> + if ret)
I doubt this as even be build-tested :)
> + goto err_manuf_cleanup;
>
> ret = nanddev_init(nand, &spinand_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1167,6 +1210,7 @@ static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> mtd->_block_isreserved = spinand_mtd_block_isreserved;
> mtd->_erase = spinand_mtd_erase;
> mtd->_max_bad_blocks = nanddev_mtd_max_bad_blocks;
> + mtd->_resume = spinand_mtd_resume;
>
> if (nand->ecc.engine) {
> ret = mtd_ooblayout_count_freebytes(mtd);
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 8:49 [PATCH v2] mtd: spinand: add SPI-NAND MTD resume handler patrice.chotard
2021-05-27 8:53 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-05-27 13:11 ` Patrice CHOTARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210527105346.315cf125@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox