From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1813C4708A for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8682860D07 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236648AbhE0Qzg (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 12:55:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46976 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234803AbhE0Qze (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 12:55:34 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8A7F613B5; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:53:56 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Marc Zyngier Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Eric Biederman , Bhupesh SHARMA , AKASHI Takahiro , Dave Young , Moritz Fischer , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kernel/resource: Populate child pointer in find_next_iomem_res() Message-ID: <20210527165355.GF8661@arm.com> References: <20210526190531.62751-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210526190531.62751-3-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210526190531.62751-3-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > When find_next_iomem_res() returns a resource, it doesn't > populate the child pointer (but does so with the parent). > > As we are about to need to arse child resources, populate > this pointer as well. Did you mean "parse"? ;) -- Catalin