From: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] Introduce MDIO probe order C45 over C22
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 07:03:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210601230352.GA28209@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLazBrpXbpsb6aXI@lunn.ch>
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:21:58AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 11:44:23PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 06:47:34PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 01:58:03PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> > > > > > Synopsys MAC controller is capable of pairing with external PHY devices
> > > > > > that accessible via Clause-22 and Clause-45.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is a problem when it is paired with Marvell 88E2110 which returns
> > > > > > PHY ID of 0 using get_phy_c22_id(). We can add this check in that
> > > > > > function, but this will break swphy, as swphy_reg_reg() return 0. [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to identify it is a Marvell PHY? Do any of the other
> > > > > C22 registers return anything unique? I'm wondering if adding
> > > > > .match_phy_device to genphy would work to identify it is a Marvell PHY
> > > > > and not bind to it. Or we can turn it around, make the
> > > > > .match_phy_device specifically look for the fixed-link device by
> > > > > putting a magic number in one of the vendor registers.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I checked the Marvell and did not see any unique register values.
> > > > Also, since get_phy_c22_id() returns a *phy_id== 0, it is not bind to
> > > > any PHY driver, so I don't think adding the match_phy_device check in
> > > > getphy would help.
> > >
> > > It has a Marvell ID in C45 space. So maybe we need to special case for
> > > ID 0. If we get that, go look in C45 space. If we find a valid ID, use
> > > it. If we get EOPNOTSUP because the MDIO bus is not C45 capable, or we
> > > don't find a vendor ID in C45 space, keep with id == 0 and load
> > > genphy?
> > >
> >
> > Make sense for me.
> > Let me what you think of adding the checks in *get_phy_device():
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > index 1539ea021ac0..ad9a87fadea1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > @@ -862,11 +862,21 @@ struct phy_device *get_phy_device(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, bool is_c45)
> > c45_ids.mmds_present = 0;
> > memset(c45_ids.device_ids, 0xff, sizeof(c45_ids.device_ids));
> >
> > - if (is_c45)
> > + if (is_c45) {
> > r = get_phy_c45_ids(bus, addr, &c45_ids);
> > - else
> > + } else {
> > r = get_phy_c22_id(bus, addr, &phy_id);
> >
> > + if (phy_id == 0) {
> > + r = get_phy_c45_ids(bus, addr, &c45_ids);
> > + if (r == -ENOTSUPP || r == -ENODEV)
> > + return 0;
>
> This bit is not correct. I said 'or we don't find a vendor ID in C45
> space, keep with id == 0'. We need to keep backwards compatibility. If
> get_phy_c22_id() did not return an error we should create a device
> with phy_id 0, if get_phy_c45_ids() returns an error.
>
Yeah, you're right. Thanks for pointing that out. It should be:
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
index 1539ea021ac0..73bfde770f2d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -862,11 +862,22 @@ struct phy_device *get_phy_device(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, bool is_c45)
c45_ids.mmds_present = 0;
memset(c45_ids.device_ids, 0xff, sizeof(c45_ids.device_ids));
- if (is_c45)
+ if (is_c45) {
r = get_phy_c45_ids(bus, addr, &c45_ids);
- else
+ } else {
r = get_phy_c22_id(bus, addr, &phy_id);
+ if (phy_id == 0) {
+ r = get_phy_c45_ids(bus, addr, &c45_ids);
+ if (r == -ENOTSUPP || r == -ENODEV)
+ return phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id,
+ false, &c45_ids);
+ else
+ return phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id,
+ true, &c45_ids);
+ }
+ }
+
if (r)
return ERR_PTR(r);
VK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 5:58 [RFC net-next 0/2] Introduce MDIO probe order C45 over C22 Wong Vee Khee
2021-05-25 13:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-06-01 10:47 ` Wong Vee Khee
2021-06-01 13:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-06-01 15:44 ` Wong Vee Khee
2021-06-01 22:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-06-01 23:03 ` Wong Vee Khee [this message]
2021-06-02 2:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-06-02 14:15 ` Wong Vee Khee
2021-06-02 15:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-06-02 23:51 ` Wong Vee Khee
2021-06-05 0:37 ` Wong Vee Khee
2021-06-05 18:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-06-06 0:54 ` Wong Vee Khee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210601230352.GA28209@linux.intel.com \
--to=vee.khee.wong@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).