public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Jarmo Tiitto <jarmo.tiitto@gmail.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <wcw@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	morbo@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] pgo: Fix allocate_node() v2
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 14:36:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202106031436.132E0ED9A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e94352-0b24-1ab1-8b54-b6ffd4347963@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 02:14:24PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On 6/3/2021 6:38 AM, Jarmo Tiitto wrote:
> > Based on Kees and others feedback here is v2 patch
> > that clarifies why the current checks in allocate_node()
> > are flawed. I did fair amount of KGDB time on it.
> > 
> > When clang instrumentation eventually calls allocate_node()
> > the struct llvm_prf_data *p argument tells us from what section
> > we should reserve the vnode: It either points into vmlinux's
> > core __llvm_prf_data section or some loaded module's
> > __llvm_prf_data section.
> > 
> > But since we don't have access to corresponding
> > __llvm_prf_vnds section(s) for any module, the function
> > should return just NULL and ignore any profiling attempts
> > from modules for now.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jarmo Tiitto <jarmo.tiitto@gmail.com>
> 
> I agree with Nick on the comments about the commit message. A few more small
> nits below, not sure they necessitate a v3, up to you. Thank you for the
> patch!

It would make my life easier to get a v3. :) I agree with all of
Nathan's suggestions. :)

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-03 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-03 13:38 [PATCH v2 1/1] pgo: Fix allocate_node() v2 Jarmo Tiitto
2021-06-03 20:50 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-03 20:52   ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-03 21:00     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-03 21:14 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-03 21:36   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-06-04  9:40     ` Jarmo Tiitto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202106031436.132E0ED9A@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=jarmo.tiitto@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=wcw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox