From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/vfio-ap: clean up mdev resources when remove callback invoked
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:48:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611164854.GT1002214@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609224634.575156-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:46:32PM -0400, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> The mdev remove callback for the vfio_ap device driver bails out with
> -EBUSY if the mdev is in use by a KVM guest (i.e., the KVM pointer in the
> struct ap_matrix_mdev is not NULL). The intended purpose was
> to prevent the mdev from being removed while in use. There are two
> problems with this scenario:
>
> 1. Returning a non-zero return code from the remove callback does not
> prevent the removal of the mdev.
>
> 2. The KVM pointer in the struct ap_matrix_mdev will always be NULL because
> the remove callback will not get invoked until the mdev fd is closed.
> When the mdev fd is closed, the mdev release callback is invoked and
> clears the KVM pointer from the struct ap_matrix_mdev.
>
> Let's go ahead and remove the check for KVM in the remove callback and
> allow the cleanup of mdev resources to proceed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 22:46 [PATCH 0/3] s390/vfio-ap: refactor mdev remove callback and locks Tony Krowiak
2021-06-09 22:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390/vfio-ap: clean up mdev resources when remove callback invoked Tony Krowiak
2021-06-11 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-06-14 17:29 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-06-15 7:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-09 22:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: introduce two new r/w locks to replace wait_queue_head_t Tony Krowiak
2021-06-11 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-11 17:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-11 17:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 22:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer Tony Krowiak
2021-06-11 17:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-15 8:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-15 18:08 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-06-15 18:55 ` Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210611164854.GT1002214@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox