From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0643EC48BE5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1E761159 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231889AbhFPHpU (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:45:20 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53049 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231628AbhFPHpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:45:19 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 454156736F; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:43:11 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jason Wang , Paolo Bonzini , slp@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio_blk: blk-mq io_poll support Message-ID: <20210616074310.GA2910@lst.de> References: <20210520141305.355961-1-stefanha@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > Christoph and Jens: Any more thoughts on this irq toggling approach? I think it would eventually come back and byte us and would much prefer explicit poll queues.