From: Yaohui Wang <yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
luoben@linux.alibaba.com, yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] kernel/resource: fix boundary judgment issues in find_next_iomem_res() and __walk_iomem_res_desc()
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:34:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210621123419.2976-3-yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210621123419.2976-1-yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com>
Memory resources are described with the start address and the inclusive
end address, which means for a resource with 1 byte length the start
address is the same as the end address.
find_next_iomem_res() and __walk_iomem_res_desc() ignore resources with
1 byte length, which prevents that ioremap_xxx(phys_addr, 1) is checked
whether it touches non-ioremappable resources.
Fixes: 010a93bf97c7 (resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue)
Fixes: b69c2e20f6e4 (resource: Clean it up a bit)
Signed-off-by: Yahui Wang <yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Luo <luoben@linux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/resource.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index ca9f5198a01f..31e371babfad 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
if (!res)
return -EINVAL;
- if (start >= end)
+ if (start > end)
return -EINVAL;
read_lock(&resource_lock);
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
struct resource res;
int ret = -EINVAL;
- while (start < end &&
+ while (start <= end &&
!find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
ret = (*func)(&res, arg);
if (ret)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-21 12:34 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/ioremap: fix boundary calculation and boundary judgment issues for ioremap() Yaohui Wang
2021-06-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/ioremap: fix the pfn calculation mistake in __ioremap_check_ram() Yaohui Wang
2021-07-01 14:41 ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-02 10:05 ` Yaohui Wang
2021-07-02 14:49 ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-05 2:11 ` Yaohui Wang
2021-06-21 12:34 ` Yaohui Wang [this message]
2021-07-01 16:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kernel/resource: fix boundary judgment issues in find_next_iomem_res() and __walk_iomem_res_desc() Dave Hansen
2021-07-01 2:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/ioremap: fix boundary calculation and boundary judgment issues for ioremap() Yaohui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210621123419.2976-3-yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoben@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox