public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Sandor Bodo-Merle <sbodomerle@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: Support multi-MSI only on uniprocessor kernel
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:47:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210621144702.GD27516@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210606123044.31250-2-sbodomerle@gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 02:30:44PM +0200, Sandor Bodo-Merle wrote:
> The interrupt affinity scheme used by this driver is incompatible with
> multi-MSI as it implies moving the doorbell address to that of another MSI
> group.  This isn't possible for multi-MSI, as all the MSIs must have the
> same doorbell address. As such it is restricted to systems with a single
> CPU.
> 
> Fixes: fc54bae28818 ("PCI: iproc: Allow allocation of multiple MSIs")
> Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sandor Bodo-Merle <sbodomerle@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can you just resend the series with the very minor changes requested
fixed please ?

Please carry/apply the review tags as well.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
> index 557d93dcb3bc..81b4effeb130 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static struct irq_chip iproc_msi_irq_chip = {
>  
>  static struct msi_domain_info iproc_msi_domain_info = {
>  	.flags = MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> -		MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX,
> +		MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX,
>  	.chip = &iproc_msi_irq_chip,
>  };
>  
> @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
>  	struct iproc_msi *msi = domain->host_data;
>  	int hwirq, i;
>  
> +	if (msi->nr_cpus > 1 && nr_irqs > 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&msi->bitmap_lock);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -540,6 +543,9 @@ int iproc_msi_init(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct device_node *node)
>  	mutex_init(&msi->bitmap_lock);
>  	msi->nr_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
>  
> +	if (msi->nr_cpus == 1)
> +		iproc_msi_domain_info.flags |=  MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI;
> +
>  	msi->nr_irqs = of_irq_count(node);
>  	if (!msi->nr_irqs) {
>  		dev_err(pcie->dev, "found no MSI GIC interrupt\n");
> -- 
> 2.31.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-21 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-06 12:30 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: iproc: fix the base vector number allocation for multi-MSI Sandor Bodo-Merle
2021-06-06 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: Support multi-MSI only on uniprocessor kernel Sandor Bodo-Merle
2021-06-06 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-07 16:48   ` Ray Jui
2021-06-07 21:18     ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-21 14:47   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2021-06-22 15:26     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: iproc: Fix multi-MSI base vector number allocation Sandor Bodo-Merle
2021-06-22 15:44       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-22 15:26     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: iproc: Support multi-MSI only on uniprocessor kernel Sandor Bodo-Merle
2021-06-06 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: iproc: fix the base vector number allocation for multi-MSI Marc Zyngier
2021-06-06 14:10 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-07 16:45 ` Ray Jui
2021-06-10 23:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210621144702.GD27516@lpieralisi \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbodomerle@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox