From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] posix-cpu-timers: Assert task sighand is locked while starting cputime counter
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 01:41:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210622234155.119685-3-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210622234155.119685-1-frederic@kernel.org>
Starting the process wide cputime counter needs to be done in the same
sighand locking sequence than actually arming the related timer
otherwise we risk races against concurrent timers setting/expiring
in the same threadgroup.
Detecting that we start the cputime counter without holding the sighand
lock is a first step toward debugging such situations.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/signal.c | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 7f4278fa21fe..65914e9be683 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -709,6 +709,12 @@ static inline void unlock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *task,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->sighand->siglock, *flags);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+extern void lockdep_assert_task_sighand_held(struct task_struct *task);
+#else
+static inline void lockdep_assert_task_sighand_held(struct task_struct *task) { }
+#endif
+
static inline unsigned long task_rlimit(const struct task_struct *task,
unsigned int limit)
{
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index f7c6ffcbd044..82cbb8ecff5a 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1440,6 +1440,19 @@ struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
return sighand;
}
+void lockdep_assert_task_sighand_held(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ struct sighand_struct *sighand;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sighand = rcu_dereference(task->sighand);
+ if (sighand)
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sighand->siglock);
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
/*
* send signal info to all the members of a group
*/
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index aa52fc85dbcb..f78ccab58aa4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -291,6 +291,8 @@ static void thread_group_start_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 *samples)
struct thread_group_cputimer *cputimer = &tsk->signal->cputimer;
struct posix_cputimers *pct = &tsk->signal->posix_cputimers;
+ lockdep_assert_task_sighand_held(tsk);
+
/* Check if cputimer isn't running. This is accessed without locking. */
if (!READ_ONCE(pct->timers_active)) {
struct task_cputime sum;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 23:41 [PATCH 0/7] posix-cpu-timers: Bunch of fixes v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] posix-cpu-timers: Fix rearm racing against process tick Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-06-23 11:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] posix-cpu-timers: Assert task sighand is locked while starting cputime counter Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] posix-cpu-timers: Force next_expiration recalc after timer deletion Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] posix-cpu-timers: Force next expiration recalc after itimer reset Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] posix-cpu-timers: Remove confusing error code override Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessor Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-22 23:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] posix-cpu-timers: Recalc next expiration when timer_settime() ends up not queueing Frederic Weisbecker
2021-06-28 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-28 15:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] posix-cpu-timers: Bunch of fixes v2 Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210622234155.119685-3-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox