Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] memcg: infrastructure to flush memcg stats

Shakeel Butt
2021-07-16T15:14:39Z

Hi Marek

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:03 AM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 14.07.2021 03:39, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > At the moment memcg stats are read in four contexts:
> >
> > 1. memcg stat user interfaces
> > 2. dirty throttling
> > 3. page fault
> > 4. memory reclaim
> >
> > Currently the kernel flushes the stats for first two cases. Flushing the
> > stats for remaining two casese may have performance impact. Always
> > flushing the memcg stats on the page fault code path may negatively
> > impacts the performance of the applications. In addition flushing in the
> > memory reclaim code path, though treated as slowpath, can become the
> > source of contention for the global lock taken for stat flushing because
> > when system or memcg is under memory pressure, many tasks may enter the
> > reclaim path.
> >
> > This patch uses following mechanisms to solve these challenges:
> >
> > 1. Periodically flush the stats from root memcg every 2 seconds. This
> > will time limit the out of sync stats.
> >
> > 2. Asynchronously flush the stats after fixed number of stat updates.
> > In the worst case the stat can be out of sync by O(nr_cpus * BATCH) for
> > 2 seconds.
> >
> > 3. For avoiding thundering herd to flush the stats particularly from the
> > memory reclaim context, introduce memcg local spinlock and let only one
> > flusher active at a time. This could have been done through
> > cgroup_rstat_lock lock but that lock is used by other subsystem and for
> > userspace reading memcg stats. So, it is better to keep flushers
> > introduced by this patch decoupled from cgroup_rstat_lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
>
> This patch landed in today's linux-next (next-20210716) as commit
> 42265e014ac7 ("memcg: infrastructure to flush memcg stats"). On my test
> system's I found that it triggers a kernel BUG on all ARM64 boards:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c:200
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 7, name:
> kworker/u8:0
> 3 locks held by kworker/u8:0/7:
> #0: ffff00004000c938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
> process_one_work+0x200/0x718
> #1: ffff80001334bdd0 ((stats_flush_dwork).work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
> process_one_work+0x200/0x718
> #2: ffff8000124f6d40 (stats_flush_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at:
> mem_cgroup_flush_stats+0x20/0x48
> CPU: 2 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G W 5.14.0-rc1+ #3713
> Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B (DT)
> Workqueue: events_unbound flush_memcg_stats_dwork
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d0
> show_stack+0x14/0x20
> dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xb0
> dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
> ___might_sleep+0x1dc/0x200
> __might_sleep+0x4c/0x88
> cgroup_rstat_flush+0x2c/0x58
> mem_cgroup_flush_stats+0x34/0x48
> flush_memcg_stats_dwork+0xc/0x38
> process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
> worker_thread+0x48/0x460
> kthread+0x12c/0x160
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> This can be also reproduced with QEmu. Please let me know if I can help
> fixing this issue.
>

Thanks for the report. The issue can be fixed by changing
cgroup_rstat_flush() to cgroup_rstat_flush_irqsafe() in
mem_cgroup_flush_stats(). I will send out the updated patch in a
couple of hours after a bit more testing.