[PATCH 5.12 028/292] drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale topology

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-19T17:58:48Z

From: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>

commit 3769e4c0af5b82c8ea21d037013cb9564dfaa51f upstream.

[Why]
After unplug/hotplug hub from the system, userspace might start to
clear stale payloads gradually. If we call drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi()
to release stale VCPI of those ports which are not relating to current
topology, we have chane to wrongly clear active payload table entry for
current topology.

E.g.
We have allocated VCPI 1 in current payload table and we call
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() to clean VCPI 1 in stale topology. In
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), it will call drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id()
tp put VCPI 1 and which means ID 1 is available again. Thereafter, if we
want to allocate a new payload stream, it will find ID 1 is available by
drm_dp_mst_assign_payload_id(). However, ID 1 is being used

[How]
Check target sink is relating to current topology or not before doing
any payload table update.
Searching upward to find the target sink's relevant root branch device.
If the found root branch device is not the same root of current
topology, don't update payload table.

Changes since v1:
* Change debug macro to use drm_dbg_kms() instead
* Amend the commit message to add Cc tag.

Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616035501.3776-3-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_register_i2c_bus(s
static void drm_dp_mst_unregister_i2c_bus(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port);
static void drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);

+static bool drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
+ struct drm_dp_mst_branch *branch);
+
#define DBG_PREFIX "[dp_mst]"

#define DP_STR(x) [DP_ ## x] = #x
@@ -3362,6 +3365,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct d
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
int i, j;
int cur_slots = 1;
+ bool skip;

mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
@@ -3376,6 +3380,14 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct d
port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port,
vcpi);

+ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
+ skip = !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(port, mgr->mst_primary);
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
+
+ if (skip) {
+ drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not in current topology\n", i);
+ continue;
+ }
/* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing
* VCPI
*/
@@ -3475,6 +3487,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part2(struct d
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
int i;
int ret = 0;
+ bool skip;

mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
@@ -3484,6 +3497,13 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part2(struct d

port = container_of(mgr->proposed_vcpis[i], struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi);

+ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
+ skip = !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(port, mgr->mst_primary);
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
+
+ if (skip)
+ continue;
+
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("payload %d %d\n", i, mgr->payloads[i].payload_state);
if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state == DP_PAYLOAD_LOCAL) {
ret = drm_dp_create_payload_step2(mgr, port, mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]->vcpi, &mgr->payloads[i]);
@@ -4565,9 +4585,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slot
void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
{
+ bool skip;
+
if (!port->vcpi.vcpi)
return;

+ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
+ skip = !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(port, mgr->mst_primary);
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
+
+ if (skip)
+ return;
+
drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
port->vcpi.pbn = 0;