From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFF0C432BE for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 21:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CF060F9C for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 21:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231479AbhHCV6m (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:58:42 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:40764 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230124AbhHCV6l (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:58:41 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 131681C0B76; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:58:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:58:21 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Hans de Goede Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Linux LED Subsystem , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: LED subsystem lagging maintenance Message-ID: <20210803215821.GE30387@amd> References: <20210728103551.GA31304@amd> <179c4bce-ce9b-c9a8-4f24-cb4b3397e0f0@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179c4bce-ce9b-c9a8-4f24-cb4b3397e0f0@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > >> I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > >> a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > >> someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > >> > >> In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > >> in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > >> (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > >> flow? > >=20 > > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that > > important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because > > you pushed a bit too hard. > >=20 > > Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No, > > LED subsystem is not orphaned. >=20 > It is good to hear that you are still actively maintaining the LED > subsystem, thank you. >=20 > This thread does remind me that I was planning on re-sending this > LED patch which seems to have fallen through the cracks: >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20210221115208.105203-1-hdegoede@redha= t.com/ >=20 > Can you pick this one up please? Or shall I resend it? Thanks, applied. Pavel --=20 http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek --ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmEJu/0ACgkQMOfwapXb+vIm3gCdE4erM298XQat7Iyn4cBC+UZf h7EAnijY1Moszd5SPtdsjgfFXsfcD5TQ =0Lbc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H--