From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C70DC4338F for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F567610FF for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240883AbhHTOeS (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 10:34:18 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41230 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238451AbhHTOeR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 10:34:17 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id DDF216736F; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:33:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:33:37 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Yoshinori Sato , "moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: remove set_fs() for h8300 Message-ID: <20210820143337.GA30797@lst.de> References: <20210709115311.3424912-1-hch@lst.de> <20210817052003.GA4595@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 01:05:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > It took me a while to figure out that this works on architectures that > define CONFIG_UACCESS_MEMCPY, as they get the asm-generic > version of get_kernel_nofault(). Maybe add that to the changelog, > plus my > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Do you have more of these? I'm happy to take them through the > asm-generic tree, at least for architectures with no response from > the maintainers (not m68k, which looks too complex). I did partial > patches for sh and sparc at some point to remove the set_fs() callers, > but got stuck when I tried doing ia64 and didn't submit any of these. This one actually got picked up in the u8300 tree now. The only outstanding one I have is uml, waiting for maintainer feedback for that.