public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the qcom/for-next tree
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:44:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210902114346.430e7ba2@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726163814.6483-1-broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1729 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:38:14 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/firmware/Makefile
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   b42000e4b874 ("firmware: qcom_scm: Allow qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module")
> 
> from the qcom/for-next tree and commits:
> 
>   8633ef82f101 ("drivers/firmware: consolidate EFI framebuffer setup for all arches")
>   d391c5827107 ("drivers/firmware: move x86 Generic System Framebuffers support")
> 
> from the drm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/Makefile
> index 3c2af2e98def..5ced0673d94b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Makefile
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) += raspberrypi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FW_CFG_SYSFS)	+= qemu_fw_cfg.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM)		+= qcom-scm.o
>  qcom-scm-objs += qcom_scm.o qcom_scm-smc.o qcom_scm-legacy.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSFB)		+= sysfb.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB)	+= sysfb_simplefb.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_PROTOCOL)	+= ti_sci.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS) += trusted_foundations.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TURRIS_MOX_RWTM)	+= turris-mox-rwtm.o

This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-02  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 16:38 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the qcom/for-next tree Mark Brown
2021-09-02  1:44 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210902114346.430e7ba2@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox