[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 017/176] Smack: Fix wrong semantics in smk_access_entry()

Sasha Levin
2021-09-09T12:36:03Z

From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 6d14f5c7028eea70760df284057fe198ce7778dd ]

In the smk_access_entry() function, if no matching rule is found
in the rust_list, a negative error code will be used to perform bit
operations with the MAY_ enumeration value. This is semantically
wrong. This patch fixes this issue.

Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
security/smack/smack_access.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/smack/smack_access.c b/security/smack/smack_access.c
index 7eabb448acab..169929c6c4eb 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_access.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_access.c
@@ -81,23 +81,22 @@ int log_policy = SMACK_AUDIT_DENIED;
int smk_access_entry(char *subject_label, char *object_label,
struct list_head *rule_list)
{
- int may = -ENOENT;
struct smack_rule *srp;

list_for_each_entry_rcu(srp, rule_list, list) {
if (srp->smk_object->smk_known == object_label &&
srp->smk_subject->smk_known == subject_label) {
- may = srp->smk_access;
- break;
+ int may = srp->smk_access;
+ /*
+ * MAY_WRITE implies MAY_LOCK.
+ */
+ if ((may & MAY_WRITE) == MAY_WRITE)
+ may |= MAY_LOCK;
+ return may;
}
}

- /*
- * MAY_WRITE implies MAY_LOCK.
- */
- if ((may & MAY_WRITE) == MAY_WRITE)
- may |= MAY_LOCK;
- return may;
+ return -ENOENT;
}

/**
--
2.30.2