[PATCH 5.10 080/236] gve: fix the wrong AdminQ buffer overflow check

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-09-13T13:37:38Z

From: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 63a9192b8fa1ea55efeba1f18fad52bb24d9bf12 ]

The 'tail' pointer is also free-running count, so it needs to be masked
as 'adminq_prod_cnt' does, to become an index value of AdminQ buffer.

Fixes: 5cdad90de62c ("gve: Batch AQ commands for creating and destroying queues.")
Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Catherine Sullivan <csully@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c
index 24ae6a28a806..6009d76e41fc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c
@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ static int gve_adminq_issue_cmd(struct gve_priv *priv,
tail = ioread32be(&priv->reg_bar0->adminq_event_counter);

// Check if next command will overflow the buffer.
- if (((priv->adminq_prod_cnt + 1) & priv->adminq_mask) == tail) {
+ if (((priv->adminq_prod_cnt + 1) & priv->adminq_mask) ==
+ (tail & priv->adminq_mask)) {
int err;

// Flush existing commands to make room.
@@ -192,7 +193,8 @@ static int gve_adminq_issue_cmd(struct gve_priv *priv,

// Retry.
tail = ioread32be(&priv->reg_bar0->adminq_event_counter);
- if (((priv->adminq_prod_cnt + 1) & priv->adminq_mask) == tail) {
+ if (((priv->adminq_prod_cnt + 1) & priv->adminq_mask) ==
+ (tail & priv->adminq_mask)) {
// This should never happen. We just flushed the
// command queue so there should be enough space.
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.30.2