From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 03/13] rcu-tasks: Add trc_inspect_reader() checks for exiting critical section
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:45:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210915234604.3907802-3-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915234538.GA3907674@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Currently, trc_inspect_reader() treats a task exiting its RCU Tasks
Trace read-side critical section the same as being within that critical
section. However, this can fail because that task might have already
checked its .need_qs field, which means that it might never decrement
the all-important trc_n_readers_need_end counter. Of course, for that
to happen, the task would need to never again execute an RCU Tasks Trace
read-side critical section, but this really could happen if the system's
last trampoline was removed. Note that exit from such a critical section
cannot be treated as a quiescent state due to the possibility of nested
critical sections. This means that if trc_inspect_reader() sees a
negative nesting value, it must set up to try again later.
This commit therefore ignores tasks that are exiting their RCU Tasks
Trace read-side critical sections so that they will be rechecked later.
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Neeraj Upadhyay and Boqun Feng. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index c9d8583ffe59..8387e70e6b00 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static void trc_read_check_handler(void *t_in)
static bool trc_inspect_reader(struct task_struct *t, void *arg)
{
int cpu = task_cpu(t);
- bool in_qs = false;
+ int nesting;
bool ofl = cpu_is_offline(cpu);
if (task_curr(t)) {
@@ -943,18 +943,18 @@ static bool trc_inspect_reader(struct task_struct *t, void *arg)
n_heavy_reader_updates++;
if (ofl)
n_heavy_reader_ofl_updates++;
- in_qs = true;
+ nesting = 0;
} else {
// The task is not running, so C-language access is safe.
- in_qs = likely(!t->trc_reader_nesting);
+ nesting = t->trc_reader_nesting;
}
- // Mark as checked so that the grace-period kthread will
- // remove it from the holdout list.
- t->trc_reader_checked = true;
-
- if (in_qs)
- return true; // Already in quiescent state, done!!!
+ // If not exiting a read-side critical section, mark as checked
+ // so that the grace-period kthread will remove it from the
+ // holdout list.
+ t->trc_reader_checked = nesting >= 0;
+ if (nesting <= 0)
+ return !nesting; // If in QS, done, otherwise try again later.
// The task is in a read-side critical section, so set up its
// state so that it will awaken the grace-period kthread upon exit
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-15 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 23:45 [PATCH rcu 0/13] Tasks RCU updates for v5.16 Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 01/13] rcu-tasks: Wait for trc_read_check_handler() IPIs Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 02/13] rcu-tasks: Simplify trc_read_check_handler() atomic operations Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 04/13] rcu-tasks: Remove second argument of rcu_read_unlock_trace_special() Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 05/13] rcu-tasks: Fix s/instruction/instructions/ typo in comment Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 06/13] rcu-tasks: Move RTGS_WAIT_CBS to beginning of rcu_tasks_kthread() loop Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 07/13] rcu-tasks: Fix s/rcu_add_holdout/trc_add_holdout/ typo in comment Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:45 ` [PATCH rcu 08/13] rcu-tasks: Correct firstreport usage in check_all_holdout_tasks_trace Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:46 ` [PATCH rcu 09/13] rcu-tasks: Correct comparisons for CPU numbers in show_stalled_task_trace Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:46 ` [PATCH rcu 10/13] rcu-tasks: Clarify read side section info for rcu_tasks_rude GP primitives Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:46 ` [PATCH rcu 11/13] rcu-tasks: Fix read-side primitives comment for call_rcu_tasks_trace Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:46 ` [PATCH rcu 12/13] rcu-tasks: Fix IPI failure handling in trc_wait_for_one_reader Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15 23:46 ` [PATCH rcu 13/13] rcu-tasks: Update comments to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210915234604.3907802-3-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox