[PATCH rcu 04/13] rcu-tasks: Remove second argument of rcu_read_unlock_trace_special()

Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-15T23:46:13Z

The second argument of rcu_read_unlock_trace_special() is always zero.
When called from exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(), it is the constant
zero, and rcu_read_unlock_trace_special() doesn't get called from
rcu_read_unlock_trace() unless the value of local variable "nesting"
is zero because in that case the early return is taken instead.

This commit therefore removes the "nesting" argument from the
rcu_read_unlock_trace_special() function, substituting the constant
zero within that function. This commit also adds a WARN_ON_ONCE()
to rcu_read_lock_trace_held() in case non-zeroness some day appears.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h | 5 +++--
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
index 86c8f6c98412..6f9c35817398 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_trace_held(void)

#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU

-void rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(struct task_struct *t, int nesting);
+void rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(struct task_struct *t);

/**
* rcu_read_lock_trace - mark beginning of RCU-trace read-side critical section
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_trace(void)
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, nesting);
return; // We assume shallow reader nesting.
}
- rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(t, nesting);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(nesting != 0);
+ rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(t);
}

void call_rcu_tasks_trace(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 8387e70e6b00..a3f4f9bd8c67 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_iw(struct irq_work *iwp)
static DEFINE_IRQ_WORK(rcu_tasks_trace_iw, rcu_read_unlock_iw);

/* If we are the last reader, wake up the grace-period kthread. */
-void rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(struct task_struct *t, int nesting)
+void rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(struct task_struct *t)
{
int nq = READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_special.b.need_qs);

@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(struct task_struct *t, int nesting)
// Update .need_qs before ->trc_reader_nesting for irq/NMI handlers.
if (nq)
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_special.b.need_qs, false);
- WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, nesting);
+ WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, 0);
if (nq && atomic_dec_and_test(&trc_n_readers_need_end))
irq_work_queue(&rcu_tasks_trace_iw);
}
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ static void exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(struct task_struct *t)
WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting));
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, 0);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_special.b.need_qs)))
- rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(t, 0);
+ rcu_read_unlock_trace_special(t);
}

/**
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23