From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: allocate memory in a cache-friendly way
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:03:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917030334.GA20257@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUNnkxiVnHUszg7G@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:49:39AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 12:21:35PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> Currently, swiotlb uses a global index to indicate the starting point
>> of next search. The index increases from 0 to the number of slots - 1
>> and then wraps around. It is straightforward but not cache-friendly
>> because the "oldest" slot in swiotlb tends to be used first.
>>
>> Freed slots are probably accessed right before being freed, especially
>> in VM's case (device backends access them in DMA_TO_DEVICE mode; guest
>> accesses them in other DMA modes). Thus those just freed slots may
>> reside in cache. Then reusing those just freed slots can reduce cache
>> misses.
>>
>> To that end, maintain a free list for free slots and insert freed slots
>> from the head and searching for free slots always starts from the head.
>>
>> With this optimization, network throughput of sending data from host to
>> guest, measured by iperf3, increases by 7%.
>
>Wow, that is pretty awesome!
>
>Are there any other benchmarks that you ran that showed a negative
>performance?
TBH, yes. Recently I do fio tests with this patch. The impact of this patch
is: (+ means performance improvement; - means performance regression)
1-job fio:
randread: +6.7%
randwrite: -1.6%
read: +8.2%
write: +7.4%
8-job fio:
randread: -5.5%
randwrite: -12.6%
read: -24.8%
write: -45.5%
I haven't figured out why multi-job fio tests suffer. Will post v2 once
the issue gets resolved.
Thanks
Chao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-17 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-01 4:21 [PATCH] swiotlb: allocate memory in a cache-friendly way Chao Gao
2021-09-16 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-09-17 3:03 ` Chao Gao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210917030334.GA20257@gao-cwp \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox