From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Jan Hoffmann <jan@3e8.eu>
Cc: Daniel Kestrel <kestrelseventyfour@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: xway: No hardcoded ECC engine, use device tree setting
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 21:32:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917213246.319e60cb@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9dd0653-139f-749b-c088-e756ee2d2132@3e8.eu>
Hi Jan,
jan@3e8.eu wrote on Fri, 17 Sep 2021 19:45:33 +0200:
> Hi Miquèl,
>
> > I am not sure to understand your message as answer to this thread.
> > There are two problems here:
> > 1/ The DT values not being taken into account
>
> This is the issue I'm referring to.
>
> > 1/ Has already been fixed (at least that is what I think)
>
> This is not fixed in kernel 5.10. And unless I am missing something
> there also doesn't seem be a fix in more recent kernels.
>
> I am aware of commit 33d974e76e21 ("mtd: rawnand: xway: Do not force a
> particular software ECC engine"), but that only fixes the ECC
> algorithm. The ECC engine type is still hard-coded in xway_attach_chip.
Yes this was my understanding, that only software ECC engine was
supported. The mainline driver shows absolutely no signs of hardware
ECC engine support.
Perhaps however you mean that on-die ECC engine are not supported
anymore because of the engine_type being set in attach_chip()? If yes
then indeed there is something to do, perhaps checking if an engine has
been already set is enough? You can try something like:
if (engine_type == unknown)
engine_type = soft;
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-17 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-08 7:26 [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: xway: No hardcoded ECC engine, use device tree setting Daniel Kestrel
2021-08-16 7:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-08-19 7:21 ` Kestrel seventyfour
2021-08-19 8:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-08-23 11:19 ` Kestrel seventyfour
2021-08-23 15:24 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-08-24 7:15 ` Kestrel seventyfour
2021-08-24 17:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-08-25 8:47 ` Kestrel seventyfour
2021-08-25 8:51 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-08-25 14:07 ` Kestrel seventyfour
2021-08-25 15:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-08-26 5:27 ` Kestrel seventyfour
2021-09-16 19:38 ` Jan Hoffmann
2021-09-17 17:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-09-17 17:45 ` Jan Hoffmann
2021-09-17 19:32 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-09-18 21:26 ` Jan Hoffmann
2021-09-27 16:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-09-27 20:32 ` Jan Hoffmann
2021-09-28 8:49 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210917213246.319e60cb@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=jan@3e8.eu \
--cc=kestrelseventyfour@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox