From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Iain Hunter <drhunter95@gmail.com>,
lothar.felten@gmail.com, iain@hunterembedded.co.uk,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workaround regression in ina2xx introduced by cb47755725da("time: Prevent undefined behaviour in timespec64_to_ns()")
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:18:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210930171844.0c67b0ff@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o88favd9.ffs@tglx>
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 23:18:42 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26 2021 at 18:16, Iain Hunter wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> > @@ -817,10 +817,10 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *data)
> > */
> > do {
> > timespec64_add_ns(&next, 1000 * sampling_us);
> > - delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
> > - delay_us = div_s64(timespec64_to_ns(&delta), 1000);
> > - } while (delay_us <= 0);
> > + } while (timespec64_compare(&next, &now) < 0);
> >
> > + delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
> > + delay_us = div_s64(timespec64_to_ns(&delta), 1000);
>
> This whole timespec dance does not make any sense and can be completely
> avoided by using just scalar nanoseconds. Untested patch below.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Thanks Thomas.
Iain could you test this approach?
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
> struct ina2xx_chip_info *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> int sampling_us = SAMPLING_PERIOD(chip);
> int ret;
> - struct timespec64 next, now, delta;
> + ktime_t next, now, delta;
> s64 delay_us;
>
> /*
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
> if (!chip->allow_async_readout)
> sampling_us -= 200;
>
> - ktime_get_ts64(&next);
> + next = ktime_get();
>
> do {
> while (!chip->allow_async_readout) {
> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
> * reset the reference timestamp.
> */
> if (ret == 0)
> - ktime_get_ts64(&next);
> + next = ktime_get();
> else
> break;
> }
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ktime_get_ts64(&now);
> + now = ktime_get();
>
> /*
> * Advance the timestamp for the next poll by one sampling
> @@ -816,11 +816,10 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
> * multiple times, i.e. samples are dropped.
> */
> do {
> - timespec64_add_ns(&next, 1000 * sampling_us);
> - delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
> - delay_us = div_s64(timespec64_to_ns(&delta), 1000);
> - } while (delay_us <= 0);
> + next = ktime_add_us(next, sampling_us);
> + } while (next <= now);
>
> + delay_us = ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(next, now));
> usleep_range(delay_us, (delay_us * 3) >> 1);
>
> } while (!kthread_should_stop());
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-26 17:16 [PATCH v3] workaround regression in ina2xx introduced by cb47755725da("time: Prevent undefined behaviour in timespec64_to_ns()") Iain Hunter
2021-09-26 21:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-30 16:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-09-30 16:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210930171844.0c67b0ff@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=drhunter95@gmail.com \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=iain@hunterembedded.co.uk \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lothar.felten@gmail.com \
--cc=matt.ranostay@konsulko.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox