[PATCH 5.10 83/93] ASoC: dapm: use component prefix when checking widget names

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-04T13:26:10Z

From: Shuming Fan <shumingf@realtek.com>

commit ae4fc532244b3bb4d86c397418d980b0c6be1dfd upstream.

On a TigerLake SoundWire platform, we see these warnings:

[ 27.360086] rt5682 sdw:0:25d:5682:0: ASoC: DAPM unknown pin MICBIAS
[ 27.360092] rt5682 sdw:0:25d:5682:0: ASoC: DAPM unknown pin Vref2

This is root-caused to the addition of a component prefix in the
machine driver. The tests in soc-dapm should account for a prefix
instead of reporting an invalid issue.

Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuming Fan <shumingf@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210208234043.59750-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee <lerobert@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -2528,9 +2528,20 @@ static struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *dapm_
{
struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w;
struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *fallback = NULL;
+ char prefixed_pin[80];
+ const char *pin_name;
+ const char *prefix = soc_dapm_prefix(dapm);
+
+ if (prefix) {
+ snprintf(prefixed_pin, sizeof(prefixed_pin), "%s %s",
+ prefix, pin);
+ pin_name = prefixed_pin;
+ } else {
+ pin_name = pin;
+ }

for_each_card_widgets(dapm->card, w) {
- if (!strcmp(w->name, pin)) {
+ if (!strcmp(w->name, pin_name)) {
if (w->dapm == dapm)
return w;
else