From: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
<will@kernel.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 23:23:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211005152308.1061-3-longpeng2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211005152308.1061-1-longpeng2@huawei.com>
__domain_mapping() always removes the pages in the range from
'iov_pfn' to 'end_pfn', but the 'end_pfn' is always the last pfn
of the range that the caller wants to map.
This would introduce too many duplicated removing and leads the
map operation take too long, for example:
Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
...
it takes about 50ms in total.
We can reduce the cost by recalculate the 'end_pfn' and limit it
to the boundary of the end of this pte page.
Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x13ffff
iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x17ffff
iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x1bffff
iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x1fffff
iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x23ffff
...
it only need 9ms now.
Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 12 +++++++-----
include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index d75f59a..87cbf34 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -2354,12 +2354,18 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
return -ENOMEM;
first_pte = pte;
+ lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
+ BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
+
/* It is large page*/
if (largepage_lvl > 1) {
unsigned long end_pfn;
+ unsigned long pages_to_remove;
pteval |= DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
- end_pfn = ((iov_pfn + nr_pages) & level_mask(largepage_lvl)) - 1;
+ pages_to_remove = min_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
+ nr_pte_to_next_page(pte) * lvl_pages);
+ end_pfn = iov_pfn + pages_to_remove - 1;
switch_to_super_page(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn, largepage_lvl);
} else {
pteval &= ~(uint64_t)DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
@@ -2381,10 +2387,6 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
WARN_ON(1);
}
- lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
-
- BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
-
nr_pages -= lvl_pages;
iov_pfn += lvl_pages;
phys_pfn += lvl_pages;
diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
index a590b00..623b407 100644
--- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
@@ -713,6 +713,12 @@ static inline bool first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
return !((unsigned long)pte & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK);
}
+static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
+{
+ return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
+ (struct dma_pte *)ALIGN((unsigned long)pte, VTD_PAGE_SIZE) - pte;
+}
+
extern struct dmar_drhd_unit * dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
extern int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
--
1.8.3.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 15:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: boost the mapping process Longpeng(Mike)
2021-10-05 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: convert the return type of first_pte_in_page to bool Longpeng(Mike)
2021-10-07 6:18 ` Lu Baolu
2021-10-07 11:43 ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2021-10-05 15:23 ` Longpeng(Mike) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211005152308.1061-3-longpeng2@huawei.com \
--to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox