From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211011114041.GB16138@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211005062359-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:42:43AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Stefan also pointed out this duplicates the logic from
>
> if (blksize < 512 || blksize > PAGE_SIZE || !is_power_of_2(blksize))
> return -EINVAL;
>
>
> and a bunch of other places.
>
>
> Would it be acceptable for blk layer to validate the input
> instead of having each driver do it's own thing?
> Maybe inside blk_queue_logical_block_size?
I'm pretty sure we want down that before. Let's just add a helper
just for that check for now as part of this series. Actually validating
in in blk_queue_logical_block_size seems like a good idea, but returning
errors from that has a long tail.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-11 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 10:16 [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space Xie Yongji
2021-08-10 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-10 4:59 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-10 6:59 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-22 23:17 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 4:31 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 8:07 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 8:35 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 9:04 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 9:27 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 9:38 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 10:33 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 10:45 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 11:41 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 12:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-23 12:40 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 16:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-23 22:31 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-24 2:47 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-24 10:11 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-24 12:52 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-24 13:30 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-24 13:38 ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-24 13:48 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-10-04 15:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-04 15:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 15:52 ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-05 10:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 15:45 ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-05 18:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-11 11:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-10-13 12:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-13 12:34 ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-13 12:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-13 12:59 ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-05 15:24 ` Yongji Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211011114041.GB16138@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox