public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/i915: Fix dereference of pointer backup before it is null checked
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:12:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211012151218.GF8429@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c49654d9-7174-f6db-e64b-bec3ecde7b5c@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/12/21 15:25, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > The assignment of pointer backup_bo dereferences pointer backup before
> > backup is null checked, this could lead to a null pointer dereference
> > issue. Fix this by only assigning backup_bo after backup has been null
> > checked.
> > 
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference before null check")
> > Fixes: c56ce9565374 ("drm/i915 Implement LMEM backup and restore for suspend / resume")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> There's not really a pointer dereference here, just pointer arithmetics, so
> the code should be safe (but admittedly fragile), so to keep Coverity happy,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

Yeah.  I kind of feel like we shouldn't work around static checker bugs.
But when we do then there shouldn't be a Fixes tag.

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-12 13:25 [PATCH][next] drm/i915: Fix dereference of pointer backup before it is null checked Colin King
2021-10-12 14:47 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-12 15:12   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211012151218.GF8429@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox