From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
Cc: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>,
gustavoars@kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: acrn: Prefer array_syze and struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:29:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202110130028.11D761B3@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012013429.GA28284@louislifei-OptiPlex-7050>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 09:34:29AM +0800, Li Fei1 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Len Baker wrote:
> > As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> > and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> > multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> > function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> > to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> > caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> > overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> >
> > So, use the array_size() helper to do the arithmetic instead of the
> > argument "count * size" in the vzalloc() function.
> >
> > Also, take the opportunity to add a flexible array member of struct
> > vm_memory_region_op to the vm_memory_region_batch structure. And then,
> > change the code accordingly and use the struct_size() helper to do the
> > arithmetic instead of the argument "size + size * count" in the kzalloc
> > function.
> >
> > This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle and audited and fixed
> > manually.
> >
> > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
>
> Hi Baker
>
> Thanks for helping us to fix this issue. This patch looks good to me.
> Please add Signed-off-by: Fei Li <fei1.li@intel.com>.
> Only two minor comments.
For v2, please fix the Subject typo, too. :) "syze" -> "size".
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-11 10:39 [PATCH] virt: acrn: Prefer array_syze and struct_size over open coded arithmetic Len Baker
2021-10-12 1:34 ` Li Fei1
2021-10-13 7:29 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-10-15 15:52 ` Len Baker
2021-10-18 1:07 ` Li Fei1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202110130028.11D761B3@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=fei1.li@intel.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=len.baker@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox