From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C457C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DC461056 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231919AbhJMLjj (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 07:39:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:39754 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231208AbhJMLjh (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 07:39:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634125054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/Q1uj+xycIDtoo2HHvnO92qdohILxo/PDfUXBVZcT2E=; b=RMt10QfgZODIMF+pDFomB1ZdXkbtJlL3xZdmNz33X2acZjdQ/uvW7loGlJUN/HhE4JU0bW 8gNaHNXxUSdtsbBqHOlcHgGl7rM2WGlNJTvq7VQ6033zLqkGtFHCaC64Y0IF7Il/BXRWoU 4rxS3Q/1FsUQ2MzfWBtiqf0y/TFQsuI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-164-Uc6PD-_cMNi5GBQ83NWEdw-1; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 07:37:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Uc6PD-_cMNi5GBQ83NWEdw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB8D10168DE; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fuller.cnet (ovpn-112-2.gru2.redhat.com [10.97.112.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F257590BA; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fuller.cnet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C9CF4188580; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:37:06 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:37:06 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nitesh Lal , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Frederic Weisbecker , Christoph Lameter , Juri Lelli , Alex Belits , Peter Xu Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/8] add basic task isolation prctl interface Message-ID: <20211013113706.GA92593@fuller.cnet> References: <20211007192346.731667417@fedora.localdomain> <20211007193525.755160804@fedora.localdomain> <20211013105637.GA88322@fuller.cnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211013105637.GA88322@fuller.cnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:56:37AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:05:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:23:47PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > Add basic prctl task isolation interface, which allows > > > informing the kernel that application is executing > > > latency sensitive code (where interruptions are undesired). > > > > > > Interface is described by task_isolation.rst (added by > > > next patch). > > > > That does not absolve you from actually writing a changelog here. > > Life is too short to try and read rst shit. > > The rst is concise and contains all necessary information. > > Changelog is on the patch header (I would appreciate reviews of > the interface itself, not sure why the changelog is important). Err, changelog is on the patchset intro.