public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	acme <acme@kernel.org>, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	0day robot <lkp@intel.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp <lkp@lists.01.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Qiang Zhang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>,
	robdclark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	christian <christian@brauner.io>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	bristot <bristot@redhat.com>,
	aubrey li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	yu c chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [sched.h] 317419b91e: perf-sanity-tests.Parse_sched_tracepoints_fields.fail
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:14:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202110140910.295E856@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALOAHbAhT1bTAThrmA1zYE5q8shR4dxZf5fqcq_9wVrV+XwVEQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:40:04PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:50 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> >
> > ----- On Oct 14, 2021, at 9:11 AM, Yafang Shao laoar.shao@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:09 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> > > <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ----- On Oct 14, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Yafang Shao laoar.shao@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> [...]
> > >> >> If it happens that this ABI break is noticed by more than an in-tree test
> > >> >> program, then
> > >> >> the kernel's ABI rules will require that this trace field size stays unchanged.
> > >> >> This brings
> > >> >> up once more the whole topic of "Tracepoints ABI" which has been discussed
> > >> >> repeatedly in
> > >> >> the past.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > I will check if any other in-tree tools depends on TASK_COMM_LEN.
> > >>
> > >> That's a start, but given this is a userspace ABI, out-of-tree userland
> > >> tools which depend of this to be fixed-size are also relevant.
> > >>
> > >
> > > TASK_COMM_LEN isn't defined in include/uapi/ directory, so it seems
> > > that it isn't the uerspace ABI?
> >
> > One case where this 16 bytes size is expected by userspace is prctl(2) PR_GET_NAME
> > and PR_SET_NAME.
> >
> 
> the prctl(2) man page says that:
> : PR_SET_NAME
> :        If the length of the string, including the terminating
> :        null byte, exceeds 16 bytes, the string is silently truncated.
> : PR_GET_NAME
> :         The buffer should allow space for up to 16 bytes
> :          the returned string will be null-terminated.
> 
> As the string returned to user space is null-terminated, extending
> task comm won't break the prctl(2) user code.

If userspace was:

	char comm[16];
	int important_values;

	...

	prctl(PR_GET_NAME, pid, comm);

the kernel will clobber "important_values", so prctl() must enforce the
old size (and terminate it correctly). It's not okay for us to expect
that userspace get recompiled -- old binaries must continue to work
correctly on kernel kernels.

        case PR_GET_NAME:
                get_task_comm(comm, me);
                if (copy_to_user((char __user *)arg2, comm, sizeof(comm)))
                        return -EFAULT;
                break;

This looks like it needs to be explicitly NUL terminated at 16 as well.

I'd say we need a TASK_COMM_LEN_V1 to use in all the old hard-coded
places.

-Kees

> 
> > The other case I am referring to is with ftrace and perf:
> >
> > mount -t tracefs nodev /sys/kernel/tracing
> > cat /sys/kernel/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/format
> >
> > name: sched_switch
> > ID: 314
> > format:
> > [...]
> >         field:char prev_comm[16];       offset:8;       size:16;        signed:1;
> > [...]
> >         field:char next_comm[16];       offset:40;      size:16;        signed:1;
> >
> > Both of those fields expose a fixed-size of 16 bytes.
> >
> > AFAIK Steven's intent was that by parsing this file, trace viewers could adapt to
> > changes in the event field layout. Unfortunately, there have been cases where
> > trace viewers had a hard expectation on the field layout. Hopefully those have
> > all been fixed a while ago.
> >
> 
> I don't have a clear idea what will happen to trace viewers if we
> extend task comm.
> 
> Steven, do you have any suggestions ?
> 
> -- 
> Thanks
> Yafang

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-10 10:24 [PATCH v3 0/4] task_struct: extend task comm from 16 to 24 for CONFIG_BASE_FULL Yafang Shao
2021-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] connector: use __get_task_comm in proc_comm_connector Yafang Shao
2021-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] fs/exec: use strscpy instead of strlcpy in __set_task_comm Yafang Shao
2021-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] sched.h: extend task comm from 16 to 24 for CONFIG_BASE_FULL Yafang Shao
2021-10-14  7:27   ` [sched.h] 317419b91e: perf-sanity-tests.Parse_sched_tracepoints_fields.fail kernel test robot
2021-10-14  9:24     ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-14 12:42       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-10-14 13:05         ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-14 13:09           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-10-14 13:11             ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-14 13:50               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-10-14 14:40                 ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-14 14:48                   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-14 15:05                     ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-14 16:14                   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-10-15  2:05                     ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-15  2:14                       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-15  2:20                         ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-19 16:51         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-20  4:01           ` Yafang Shao
2021-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] kernel/kthread: show a warning if kthread's comm is truncated Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202110140910.295E856@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@windriver.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox