public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid bitwise vs logical OR warning in snb_wm_latency_quirk()
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:19:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014211916.3550122-1-nathan@kernel.org> (raw)

A new warning in clang points out a place in this file where a bitwise
OR is being used with boolean types:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3066:12: warning: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
        changed = ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency, 12) |
                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This construct is intentional, as it allows every one of the calls to
ilk_increase_wm_latency() to occur (instead of short circuiting with
logical OR) while still caring about the result of each call.

To make this clearer to the compiler, use the '|=' operator to assign
the result of each ilk_increase_wm_latency() call to changed, which
keeps the meaning of the code the same but makes it obvious that every
one of these calls is expected to happen.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1473
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index f90fe39cf8ca..aaa3a0998e4c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3050,9 +3050,9 @@ static void snb_wm_latency_quirk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * The BIOS provided WM memory latency values are often
 	 * inadequate for high resolution displays. Adjust them.
 	 */
-	changed = ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency, 12) |
-		ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.spr_latency, 12) |
-		ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.cur_latency, 12);
+	changed = ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency, 12);
+	changed |= ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.spr_latency, 12);
+	changed |= ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.cur_latency, 12);
 
 	if (!changed)
 		return;

base-commit: d73b17465d6da0a94bc0fcc86b150e1e923e8f71
-- 
2.33.1.637.gf443b226ca


             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-14 21:19 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-10-14 21:21 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid bitwise vs logical OR warning in snb_wm_latency_quirk() Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-18  9:10   ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211014211916.3550122-1-nathan@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox